ArticlePloS one2007
Whole-genome sequencing and assembly with high-throughput, short-read technologies.
Article in PloS one, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 126 citations in OpenAlex.
- CRISPR/Cas9-Based Genome Editing: Understanding Differences in DNA Repair Pathways, Profiles, and Outcomes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Phytoplasma DNA Enrichment from Sugarcane White Leaves for Shotgun Sequencing Improvement.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Navigating bottlenecks and trade-offs in genomic data analysis.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2023Review
- Evolution of Microbial Genomics: Conceptual Shifts over a Quarter Century.Trends in microbiology · 2021Review
- Difference of Intrahost Dynamics of the Second Human Pegivirus and Hepatitis C Virus in HPgV-2/HCV-Coinfected Patients.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021Article
- Empirical estimation of sequencing error rates using smoothing splines.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Article
- Potential mechanisms of attenuation for rifampicin-passaged strains of Flavobacterium psychrophilum.BMC microbiology · 2015Article
- Applications of DNA barcoding to fish landings: authentication and diversity assessment.ZooKeys · 2013Article
- Article
- Exploiting sparseness in de novo genome assembly.BMC bioinformatics · 2012Article
- Article
- Genome sequence of an Australian kangaroo, Macropus eugenii, provides insight into the evolution of mammalian reproduction and development.Genome biology · 2011Article
- ECHO: a reference-free short-read error correction algorithm.Genome research · 2011Article
- Genotype and SNP calling from next-generation sequencing data.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2011Review
- The effect of next-generation sequencing technology on complex trait research.European journal of clinical investigation · 2011Review
- Article
- Inferring viral quasispecies spectra from 454 pyrosequencing reads.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- Design, validation and annotation of transcriptome-wide oligonucleotide probes for the oligochaete annelid Eisenia fetida.PloS one · 2010Article
- Simultaneous prediction of transcription factor binding sites in a group of prokaryotic genomes.BMC bioinformatics · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
While recently developed short-read sequencing technologies may dramatically reduce the sequencing cost and eventually achieve the $1000 goal for re-sequencing, their limitations prevent the de novo sequencing of eukaryotic genomes with the standard shotgun sequencing protocol. We present SHRAP (SHort Read Assembly Protocol), a sequencing protocol and assembly methodology that utilizes high-throughput short-read technologies. We describe a variation on hierarchical sequencing with two crucial differences: (1) we select a clone library from the genome randomly rather than as a tiling path and (2) we sample clones from the genome at high coverage and reads from the clones at low coverage. We assume that 200 bp read lengths with a 1% error rate and inexpensive random fragment cloning on whole mammalian genomes is feasible. Our assembly methodology is based on first ordering the clones and subsequently performing read assembly in three stages: (1) local assemblies of regions significantly smaller than a clone size, (2) clone-sized assemblies of the results of stage 1, and (3) chromosome-sized assemblies. By aggressively localizing the assembly problem during the first stage, our method succeeds in assembling short, unpaired reads sampled from repetitive genomes. We tested our assembler using simulated reads from D. melanogaster and human chromosomes 1, 11, and 21, and produced assemblies with large sets of contiguous sequence and a misassembly rate comparable to other draft assemblies. Tested on D. melanogaster and the entire human genome, our clone-ordering method produces accurate maps, thereby localizing fragment assembly and enabling the parallelization of the subsequent steps of our pipeline. Thus, we have demonstrated that truly inexpensive de novo sequencing of mammalian genomes will soon be possible with high-throughput, short-read technologies using our methodology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.