Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17534428›Full record

ArticlePloS one2007

Molecular analysis of core kinetochore composition and assembly in Drosophila melanogaster.

Marcin R Przewloka, Wei Zhang, Patricia Costa, Vincent Archambault, Pier Paolo D'Avino, Kathryn S Lilley, Ernest D Laue, Andrew D McAinsh, David M Glover

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cell cycle control of kinetochore assembly.Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Kinetochore Architecture Employs Diverse Linker Strategies Across Evolution.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  10. The microtubule- and PP1-binding activities ofMolecular biology of the cell · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marcin R PrzewlokaCancer Research UK, Cell Cycle Genetics Research Group, Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. mrp50@cam.ac.uk
Wei Zhang
Patricia Costa
Vincent Archambault
Pier Paolo D'Avino
Kathryn S Lilley
Ernest D Laue
Andrew D McAinsh
David M Glover
University of Cambridge · GBCancer Research UK · GBMarie Curie · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E011586/1Medical Research Council G0501718
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKinetochores are large multiprotein complexes indispensable for proper chromosome segregation. Although Drosophila is a classical model organism for studies of chromosome segregation, little is known about the organization of its kinetochores. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe employed bioinformatics, proteomics and cell biology methods to identify and analyze the interaction network of Drosophila kinetochore proteins. We have shown that three Drosophila proteins highly diverged from human and yeast Ndc80, Nuf2 and Mis12 are indeed their orthologues. Affinity purification of these proteins from cultured Drosophila cells identified a further five interacting proteins with weak similarity to subunits of the SPC105/KNL-1, MIND/MIS12 and NDC80 kinetochore complexes together with known kinetochore associated proteins such as dynein/dynactin, spindle assembly checkpoint components and heterochromatin proteins. All eight kinetochore complex proteins were present at the kinetochore during mitosis and MIND/MIS12 complex proteins were also centromeric during interphase. Their down-regulation led to dramatic defects in chromosome congression/segregation frequently accompanied by mitotic spindle elongation. The systematic depletion of each individual protein allowed us to establish dependency relationships for their recruitment onto the kinetochore. This revealed the sequential recruitment of individual members of first, the MIND/MIS12 and then, NDC80 complex. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The Drosophila MIND/MIS12 and NDC80 complexes and the Spc105 protein, like their counterparts from other eukaryotic species, are essential for chromosome congression and segregation, but are highly diverged in sequence. Hierarchical dependence relationships of individual proteins regulate the assembly of Drosophila kinetochore complexes in a manner similar, but not identical, to other organisms.

Indexed as

KinetochoresAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsCells, CulturedChromatography, AffinityDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelMass SpectrometryMolecular Sequence DataProteomicsSequence Homology, Amino AcidDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17534428
PMCPMC1868777
OpenAlexW2114184294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.