Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17534011›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Medical Association2007

When race matters: disagreement in pain perception between patients and their physicians in primary care.

Lisa J Staton, Mukta Panda, Ian Chen, Inginia Genao, James Kurz, Mark Pasanen, Alex J Mechaber, Madhusudan Menon, Jane O'Rorke, JoAnn Wood and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Medical Association, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 182 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Risk factors of genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder among Black women in the United States: A conceptual review.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Generational and Gender Patterns of Prescription Opioid Misuse Among Black Adults.Journal of substance use and addiction treatment · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa J StatonUniversity of Tennessee College of Medicine-Chattanooga Unit, Chattanooga, TN 37403, USA. lisa.staton@erlanger.org
Mukta Panda
Ian Chen
Inginia Genao
James Kurz
Mark Pasanen
Alex J Mechaber
Madhusudan Menon
Jane O'Rorke
JoAnn Wood
Eric Rosenberg
Charles Faeslis
Tim Carey
Diane Calleson
Sam Cykert
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Tennessee at Chattanooga · US

Funding

UNC-CH/SHAW: PARTNERSHIP FOR HEALTH DISPARITY RESEARCHP60MD000244 · NIMHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GODLEY, PAUL A. · 2002 to 2011
$10.3M
AHRQ HHS P01 HS1086NIMHD NIH HHS MD00244PHS HHS 1-D14-HP00169-01PHS HHS D14-HP-00182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients and physicians often disagree in their assessment of pain intensity. This study explores the impact of patient factors on underestimation of pain intensity in chronic noncancer pain. We surveyed patients and their physicians in 12 primary care centers. To measure pain intensity, patients completed an 11-point numeric rating scale for which pain scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain). Physicians rated patients' pain on the same scale. We defined disagreement of pain intensity as underestimation or overestimation by 22 points. Of 601 patients approached, 463 (77%) completed the survey. The majority of participants were black (39%) or white (47%), 67% were female, and the mean age was 53 years. Physicians underestimated pain intensity relative to their patients 39% of the time. Forty-six percent agreed with their patients' pain perception, and 15% of physicians overestimated their patients' pain levels by > or =2 points. In both the bivariate and multivariable models, black race was a significant variable associated with underestimation of pain by physicians (p < 0.05; OR = 1.92; 95% CI: 1.31-2.81). This study finds that physicians are twice as likely to underestimate pain in blacks patients compared to all other ethnicities combined. A qualitative study exploring why physicians rate blacks patients' pain low is warranted.

Indexed as

PerceptionPhysician-Patient RelationsAcademic Medical CentersAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidBlack or African AmericanChronic DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesDissent and DisputesFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansInternal MedicineLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedAnalgesicsAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID17534011
PMCPMC2576060
OpenAlexW1538288831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.