ArticleJournal of the National Medical Association2007
Elective and isolated carotid endarterectomy: health disparities in utilization and outcomes, but not readmission.
Article in Journal of the National Medical Association, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient Race Independently Predicts Timeliness of Breast Cancer Reconstructive Care.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Observational
- Socioeconomic status fails to account for worse outcomes in non-Hispanic black patients undergoing carotid revascularization.Journal of vascular surgery · 2023Article
- Association of Sex With the Use and Outcomes of Carotid Revascularization: A Cohort Study.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Article
- Machine learning in prediction of individual patient readmissions for elective carotid endarterectomy, aortofemoral bypass/aortic aneurysm repair, and femoral-distal arterial bypass.SAGE open medicine · 2020Article
- Race as a predictor of delay from diagnosis to endarterectomy in clinically significant carotid stenosis.Journal of vascular surgery · 2015Article
- Readmissions after carotid artery revascularization in the Medicare population.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2015Article
- Risk factors for readmission after lower extremity bypass in the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program.Journal of vascular surgery · 2014Article
- Racial disparities in surgical care and outcomes in the United States: a comprehensive review of patient, provider, and systemic factors.Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2013Review
- Comparing the use of diagnostic imaging and receipt of carotid endarterectomy in elderly black and white stroke patients.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2012Article
- Ethnic differences in cardiovascular risks and mortality in atherothrombotic disease: insights from the Reduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) registry.Mayo Clinic proceedings · 2011Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCarotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been shown to decrease future ischemic stroke risk in selected patients. However, clinical trials did not examine the risk-benefit ratio for nonwhites, who have a greater ischemic stroke risk than whites. In general, few studies have examined the effects of race on CEA use and complications, and data on race and CEA readmission are lacking.
methodsThis study used administrative data for patients discharged from California hospitals between January 1 and December 31, 2000. Selection criteria of cases included: ICD-9 principal procedure code 38.12, principal diagnostic code 433 and diagnosis-related group 5. There were 8,080 white and 1196 nonwhite patients (228 blacks, 643 Hispanics, 325 Asians/Pacific Islanders) identified that underwent an elective and isolated CEA. For both groups, CEA rates were compared. Logistic regression was used to examine the independent effects of race on in-hospital death and stroke, as well as CEA readmission.
resultsRates of CEA use were more than three times greater for whites than nonwhites, although nonwhites were more likely to have symptomatic disease. For all patients, the complication rate was 1.9%. However, the odds of in-hospital death and stroke were greater for nonwhites than whites, but after adjustment for patient and hospital factors, these differences were only significant for stroke (OR = 1.7, P = 0.013). For both outcomes, the final models had good predictive accuracy. Overall, CEA readmission risk was 7%, and no significant racial differences were observed (P = 0.110).
conclusionsThe data suggest that CEA is performed safely in California. However, nonwhites had lower rates of initial CEA use but higher rates of in-hospital death and stroke than whites. Racial differences in stroke risk persisted after adjustment for patient and hospital factors. Finally, this study found that despite significant racial disparities in initial CEA use, whites and nonwhites were similar in their CEA readmission rates. These findings may suggest that screening initiatives are lacking for nonwhites, which may increase their risk for poorer outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17534005PMC2576064W109531944What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.