ArticleClinical drug investigation2005
Proton pump inhibitors in acute treatment of reflux oesophagitis : a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Article in Clinical drug investigation, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Economic evaluation of proton pump inhibitors in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2024Pooled it
- The Economic Impact of a Switch From Prescription-Only to Non-prescription Drugs in Italy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2018Article
- Comparative efficacy of esomeprazole and omeprazole: Racemate to single enantiomer switch.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimGastro-oesophageal reflux disease is a common medical problem that places a significant financial burden on outpatient pharmaceutical expenditure. A substantial proportion of this expenditure can be attributed to the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of PPIs currently licensed in Italy in the acute treatment of reflux oesophagitis.
methodsA decision analysis model that simulated the sequential management of reflux oesophagitis over the course of 8 weeks was constructed. Healing rates were derived from a published meta-analysis of PPIs for reflux oesophagitis. Costs of PPIs were based on retail prices in Italy, endoscopies and specialist (outpatient) visits were costed on the basis of public tariffs, and opportunity costs were calculated for general practitioner visits. The clinical effectiveness of a PPI was measured in terms of the proportion of patients healed at 8 weeks. An incremental cost-effectiveness analysis was performed, using omeprazole, the recognised 'gold standard' PPI in Italy, as the common comparator. The perspective of the analysis was the Italian National Health System (NHS). A sensitivity analysis was conducted in which the key parameters in the model were varied according to a Monte Carlo simulation of 1000 patients.
resultsEsomeprazole 40 mg/day was a dominant treatment option compared with omeprazole 20 mg/day (88.8% patients healed vs 82.2%, respectively; total treatment cost euro164.85 vs euro169.56, respectively (year of costing, 2002). Furthermore, on the basis of the 95% CIs generated by the Monte Carlo simulation, esomeprazole 40 mg/day appears to be more cost-effective than both lansoprazole 30 mg/day and pantoprazole 40 mg/day.
conclusionsEsomeprazole 40 mg/day can be considered a cost-effective treatment option for the acute treatment of reflux oesophagitis in Italy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.