Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1753170›Full record

ArticleJournal of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer : IVF1991

Reliability of gender determination using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for single cells.

C M Strom, S Rechitsky, Y Verlinsky

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer : IVF, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Gender selection: cultural and religious perspectives.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2002
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review: preimplantation diagnosis of inherited disease.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 1996
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Preimplantation diagnosis.The Western journal of medicine · 1993
    Review
  10. Sex determination in single mouse blastomeres by polymerase chain reaction.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 1993
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

C M StromReproductive Genetics Institute, Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago 60657.
S Rechitsky
Y Verlinsky

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contamination with extraneous DNA sequences is a frequent problem when performing PCR analysis of single cells. This report describes our experience with eliminating contaminating DNA sequences from PCR reagents for the purposes of gender identification. We have used amplification of Y-specific sequences to identify the gender of single human amniocytes. Female cells consistently showed no Y-specific bands but only 80% of male cells showed the expected intense Y-specific band. This phenomenon could lead to incorrect gender identification of single cells. We developed a technique of simultaneous amplification of X- and Y-specific sequences to prevent misdiagnosis because of failed PCR, which allows accurate preimplantation gender determination for women at risk for conceiving children with X-linked genetic diseases. We analyzed the gender of 141 consecutive single cells in a blinded manner without a single incorrect gender assignment.

Indexed as

Prenatal DiagnosisSex Determination AnalysisBlastomeresDNA ProbesElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsDNA Probes

Identifiers

PMID1753170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.