Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17530444›Full record

ReviewQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2007

How can quality of life researchers make their work more useful to health workers and their patients?

Gordon Guyatt, Holger Schunemann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. A systematic review of health-related quality of life instruments in patients with cancer cachexia.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2013
    Pooled it
  5. Measurement and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes in surgery: an opportunity for improvement.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2011
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Integrating health-related quality of life findings from randomized clinical trials into practice: an international study of oncologists' perspectives.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Assessing individual and neighborhood social factors in child oral health-related quality of life: a multilevel analysis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2014
    Article
  18. ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2013
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gordon GuyattCLARITY Research Group, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Health Sciences Centre, McMaster University, 1200 Main Street West, Rm. HSC 2C12, Hamilton, ON, Canada, L8N 3Z5. guyatt@mcmaster.ca
Holger Schunemann

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To make optimal use of data from randomized trials in clinical decision-making, clinicians require knowledge of the magnitude of treatment effects. Reports of trials including quality of life data often fail to report results that provide interpretable estimates of magnitude of effect. Strategies that investigators could use to remedy this problem include reporting mean differences between groups in relation to the minimal important difference and reporting the proportion of patients who benefit from treatment and the associated number needed to treat. Techniques are available that allow investigators to use the same strategies in reporting pooled estimates from meta-analyses, even when studies use different instruments to measure the same construct. These reporting approaches, as well as ensuring access to data from individual items, will also help those developing decision aids to use quality of life data.

Indexed as

Health Services ResearchOutcome Assessment, Health CareProfessional-Patient RelationsDecision Support Systems, ClinicalDecision Support TechniquesHealth PersonnelHealth Status IndicatorsHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicQuality of Life

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.