Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17530424›Full record

ReviewJournal of muscle research and cell motility2007

Sarcomere dynamics during muscular contraction and their implications to muscle function.

Ivo A Telley, Jachen Denoth

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of muscle research and cell motility, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Geometrical conditions indispensable for muscle contraction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2011
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Inter-sarcomere coordination in muscle revealed through individual sarcomere response to quick stretch.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ivo A TelleyETH Zurich, Institute for Biomechanics, HCI E 357.1, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland.
Jachen Denoth
Institute for Biomedical Engineering · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article attempts to identify the key aspects of sarcomere inhomogeneity and the dynamics of sarcomere length changes in muscle contraction experiments and focuses on understanding the mechanics of myofibrils or muscle fibres when viewed as independent units of biological motors (the half-sarcomeres) connected in series. Muscle force generation has been interpreted traditionally on the basis of the kinetics of crossbridge cycling, i.e. binding of myosin heads to actin and consecutive force generating conformational change of the head, under controlled conditions and assuming uniformity of sarcomere or half-sarcomere behaviour. However, several studies have shown that re-distribution of internal strain within myofibrils and muscle fibres may be a key player, particularly, during stretch or relaxation so that force kinetics parameters are strongly affected by sarcomere dynamics. Here, we aim to shed light on how force generation, crossbridge kinetics, and the complex sarcomere movements are to be linked and which mechanical concepts are necessary to develop a comprehensive contraction model of a myofibril.

Indexed as

Muscle ContractionAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansMolecular Motor ProteinsMuscle Fibers, SkeletalMuscle, SkeletalSarcomeresMolecular Motor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17530424
OpenAlexW2139206169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.