Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17530207›Full record

ReviewDer Anaesthesist2007

[Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models for inhaled anaesthetics].

S Kreuer, J Bruhn, W Wilhelm, T Bouillon

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

S KreuerKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, 66421 Homburg/Saar. sascha.kreuer@uniklinikum-saarland.de
J Bruhn
W Wilhelm
T Bouillon
Katholisches Klinikum Lünen/Werne , St.-Marien-Hospital Lünen · DERadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversitätsklinikum des Saarlandes · DEUniversity Hospital of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacokinetic models can be differentiated into two groups: physiological-based models and empirical models. Traditionally the pharmacokinetics of volatile anaesthetics are described using physiological-based models together with the respective tissue-blood distribution coefficients. The compartments of the empirical model have no anatomical equivalents and are merely the product of the mathematical procedure for parameter estimation. The end expiratory concentration of volatile anaesthetics is approximately equal to the arterial concentration and, therefore, the description of the transition between plasma and effect site for volatile anaesthetics plays a central role. The most important parameter here is the k(e0) value which is a time constant and describes the time delay for the transition from the central compartment to the calculated effect compartment. The k(e0) values for sevoflurane and isoflurane are the same but the concentration balance between the end-tidal concentration and the effect compartment occurs twice as quickly with desflurane. In clinical practice volatile anaesthetics are normally combined with N(2)O and/or opioids. This results in an additive interaction between volatile anaesthetics and N(2)O but a synergistic interaction of volatile anaesthetics with opioids. However, there are relatively few investigations on the interactions between the clinically widely used combination of volatile anaesthetics, N(2)O and opioids.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnesthesia, InhalationAnesthetics, InhalationElectroencephalographyHumansModels, BiologicalModels, StatisticalNitrous OxideAnesthetics, InhalationNitrous Oxide

Identifiers

PMID17530207
OpenAlexW1560224433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.