Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17525793›Full record

ArticlePLoS clinical trials2007

A cluster randomized clinical trial to improve prescribing patterns in ambulatory pediatrics.

Robert L Davis, Jeffrey Wright, Francie Chalmers, Linda Levenson, Julie C Brown, Paula Lozano, Dimitri A Christakis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS clinical trials, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Effectiveness of physician-targeted interventions to improve antibiotic use for respiratory tract infections.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Robert L DavisDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States of America. robert.l.davis@kp.org
Jeffrey Wright
Francie Chalmers
Linda Levenson
Julie C Brown
Paula Lozano
Dimitri A Christakis

Funding

PEDIATRIC EBM-GETTING EVIDENCE USED AT THE POINT OF CARER01HS010516 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DAVIS, ROBERT L · 2000 to 2002
–
AHRQ HHS R01 HS010516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHaving shown previously that an electronic prescription writer and decision support system improved pediatric prescribing behavior for otitis media in an academic clinic setting, we assessed whether point-of-care delivery of evidence could demonstrate similar effects for a wide range of other common pediatric conditions.

designCluster randomized controlled trial.

settingA teaching clinic/clinical practice site and a primary care pediatric clinic serving a rural and semi-urban patient mix.

participantsA total of 36 providers at the teaching clinic/practice site and eight providers at the private primary pediatric clinic.

interventionAn evidence-based message system that presented real-time evidence to providers based on prescribing practices for acute otitis media, allergic rhinitis, sinusitis, constipation, pharyngitis, croup, urticaria, and bronchiolitis. OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportion of prescriptions dispensed in accordance with evidence.

resultsThe proportion of prescriptions dispensed in accordance with evidence improved four percentage points, from 38% at baseline to 42% following the intervention. The control group improved by one percentage point, from 39% at baseline to 40% at trial's conclusion. The adjusted difference between the intervention and control groups was 8% (95% confidence interval 1%, 15%). Intervention effectiveness did not decrease with time.

conclusionFor common pediatric outpatient conditions, a point-of-care evidence-based prescription writer and decision support system was associated with significant improvements in prescribing practices.

Identifiers

PMID17525793
PMCPMC1876598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.