Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17525483›Full record

ReviewEndocrine pathology2006

Recent advances in histopathology and immunohistochemistry of adrenocortical carcinoma.

Hironobu Sasano, Takashi Suzuki, Takuya Moriya

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Endocrine pathology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Low Protein Expression of bothInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A rare case of synchronous adrenocortical carcinoma and renal cell carcinoma.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism · 2011
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Molecular classification and prognostication of adrenocortical tumors by transcriptome profiling.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2009
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hironobu SasanoDepartment of Pathology, Tohoku University School of Medicine and Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan. hsasano@patholo2.med.tohoku.ac.jp
Takashi Suzuki
Takuya Moriya
Tohoku University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discerning malignancy in resected adrenocortical neoplasms can pose diagnostic difficulty. Macroscopic examination is the first important step toward diagnosis and should include accurate measurement of weight and dimension of the specimens and description of the cut surface of the tumors. It is also important to sample the specimens for histological diagnosis near foci of hemorrhage and/or necrosis. Histological scoring systems evaluating multiple parameters, especially the criteria of Weiss, have been shown to be reliable in differential diagnosis between adrenocortical adenoma and carcinoma. A tumor is defined as adrenocortical carcinoma when three or more of the following criteria are met; (1) high nuclear grade, (2) mitotic rate six or more per 50 high power fields, (3) atypical mitosis, (4) clear cells less than 25%, (5) a diffuse architecture pattern in more than one-third of the tumor, (6) confluent necrosis, (7) venous invasion, (8) sinusoidal invasion, and (9) capsular invasion. The criteria are relatively straightforward and considered the most effective standard for diagnosis of adrenocortical malignancy. However, great care should be taken in applying the criteria to histological evaluation of two relatively rare and peculiar adrenocortical tumors, adrenocortical oncocytoma and pediatric adrenocortical neoplasms. At this juncture, ancillary biological or molecular markers are of little practical value in terms of differential diagnosis between adrenocortical adenoma and carcinoma but tumors with MIB1 or Ki-67 labeling index more than 2.5 may be considered malignant. Prognostic markers of adrenocortical carcinoma have not been established other than complete respectability of the tumor. There are also no surrogate markers for predicting response to therapy with Mitotane, an adrenolytic agent. It sometimes is important for surgical pathologists to differentiate adrenocortical carcinoma from metastatic malignancies of other sites. An immunohistochemical evaluation of adrenal 4 binding protein (Ad4BP) or SF-1, a transcription factor of all steroidogenesis, can aid in this differential diagnosis because nuclear immunoreactivity for this transcription factor is relatively specific to steroid producing cells.

Indexed as

Adrenal Cortex NeoplasmsAdrenocortical AdenomaAdrenocortical CarcinomaBiomarkers, TumorCell CountCell NucleusDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansImmunohistochemistryKi-67 AntigenMitotic IndexUbiquitin-Protein LigasesBiomarkers, TumorKi-67 AntigenMIB1 ligase, humanUbiquitin-Protein Ligases

Identifiers

PMID17525483
OpenAlexW2064066032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.