Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17525452›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2007

Primary care research networks in the United Kingdom.

Frank Sullivan, Chris Butler, Margaret Cupples, Ann-Louise Kinmonth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The EGPRN Research Strategy for general practice in Europe.The European journal of general practice · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Building a primary care research network - lessons to learn.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Primary care research in Norway: going in the right direction.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Research for commissioners: filling a black hole in the NHS White Paper.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011
    Article
  17. Dermatology research in primary care: why, what, and how?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Frank SullivanTayside Centre for General Practice, University of Dundee, Dundee DD2 4BF. f.m.sullivan@dundee.ac.uk
Chris Butler
Margaret Cupples
Ann-Louise Kinmonth

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Health Services ResearchHumansPrimary Health CareState MedicineUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID17525452
PMCPMC1877913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.