Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17524135›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2007

A novel nested multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for differential detection of Entamoeba histolytica, E. moshkovskii and E. dispar DNA in stool samples.

Krishna Khairnar, Subhash C Parija

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 165 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Cross-Sectional Study ofBioMed research international · 2019
    Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genotypic characterization ofFood and waterborne parasitology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Amebic liver abscess: An update.World journal of hepatology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Molecular Detection of a PathogenicPolish journal of microbiology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Frequency ofJournal of parasitology research · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Detection ofJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2022
    Article
  20. Prevalence and Molecular Identification ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Krishna KhairnarDepartment of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India. kskhairnar@yahoo.co.in <kskhairnar@yahoo.co.in>
Subhash C Parija
Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundE. histolytica, a pathogenic amoeba, is indistinguishable in its cyst and trophozoite stages from those of non-pathogenic E. moshkovskii and E. dispar by light microscopy. We have developed a nested multiplex PCR targeting a 16S-like rRNA gene for differential detection of all the three morphologically similar forms of E. histolytica, E. moshkovskii and E. dispar simultaneously in stool samples.

resultsThe species specific product size for E. histolytica, E. moshkovskii and E. dispar was 439, 553 and 174 bp respectively, which was clearly different for all the three Entamoeba species. The nested multiplex PCR showed a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 100% for the demonstration of E. histolytica, E. moshkovskii and E. dispar DNA in stool samples. The PCR was positive for E. histolytica, E. moshkovskii and E. dispar in a total of 190 out of 202 stool specimens (94% sensitive) that were positive for E. histolytica/E. dispar/E. moshkovskii by examination of stool by microscopy and/or culture. All the 35 negative control stool samples that were negative for E. histolytica/E. dispar/E. moshkovskii by microscopy and culture were also found negative by the nested multiplex PCR (100% specific). The result from the study shows that only 34.6% of the patient stool samples that were positive for E. histolytica/E. dispar/E. moshkovskii by examination of stool by microscopy and/or culture, were actually positive for pathogenic E. histolytica and the remaining majority of the stool samples were positive for non-pathogenic E. dispar or E. moshkovskii as demonstrated by the use of nested multiplex PCR.

conclusionThe present study reports a new nested multiplex PCR strategy for species specific detection and differentiation of E. histolytica, E. dispar and E. moshkovskii DNA in stool specimens. The test is highly specific, sensitive and also rapid, providing the results within 12 hours of receiving stool specimens.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, ProtozoanDNA, ProtozoanEntamoebaEntamoeba histolyticaEntamoebiasisEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFecesHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySpecies SpecificityAntigens, ProtozoanDNA, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID17524135
PMCPMC1888694
OpenAlexW2106377506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.