ReviewPaediatric drugs2007
Potential of gene expression profiling in the management of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Review in Paediatric drugs, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Apoptosis pathway signature for prediction of treatment response and clinical outcome in childhood high risk B-Precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia.American journal of cancer research · 2015Article
- Targeting the mechanisms of resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy with the cancer stem cell hypothesis.Journal of oncology · 2011Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a heterogeneous disease. Current treatment approaches are tailored according to the clinical features of the host, genotypic features of the leukemic blast, and early response to therapy. Although these approaches have been successful in dramatically improving outcomes, approximately 20% of children with ALL still relapse and many of these children do not have an identifiable adverse risk factor at presentation. Further insights into the biologic basis of the disease may contribute to novel, rational treatment strategies. Childhood ALL has served as an example for demonstrating the feasibility and potential of high-throughput technologies such as global gene expression or transcript profiling. In the last decade or so, utilization of these techniques has grown exponentially. As the methodology undergoes refinement and validation, it is plausible that microarrays may be used in the routine management of childhood ALL in the next few years. This article discusses the numerous applications to date of gene expression profiling in childhood ALL. Multiple investigators have made it evident that microarrays can be used as a single platform for the accurate classification of ALL into the various cytogenetic subtypes. Additional promising utilities include prediction of early response to therapy, overall outcome, and adverse effects. Identification of patients who are predicted to have an unfavorable outcome may allow for early intervention such as intensification of therapy or avoidance of drugs that are associated with specific secondary effects such as therapy-related acute myelogenous leukemia. Knowledge has been gained into pathways contributing to leukemogenesis and chemoresistance. Therapeutic targets have been identified, some of which are entering clinical trials following validation in additional preclinical models. These newer methods of genome analyses complemented by studies involving the proteome as well as host polymorphisms will have a profound impact on the diagnosis and management of childhood ALL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.