Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17522793›Full record

SynthesisNeurocritical care2007

Role of intracranial pressure values and patterns in predicting outcome in traumatic brain injury: a systematic review.

Miriam M Treggiari, Nicolas Schutz, N David Yanez, Jacques-Andre Romand

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurocritical care, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05593380 (The Impact of Invasive Intracranial Pressure Monitoring Guided Management on the Functional Outcomes of Patients With Supratentorial Large Volume Cerebral Hemorrhage), which is not on this map. Cited by 82 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05593380 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Impact of Invasive Intracranial Pressure Monitoring Guided Management on the Functional Outcomes of Patients With Supratentorial Large Volume Cerebral Hemorrhage: An Open Label, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-center Trial (BIATICH)

TypeinterventionalSponsorXiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityRan2022 to 2025Enrolled193ConditionsCerebral Hemorrhage, Hypertensive, Intracranial Hypertension, Monitoring, Critical CareArmsParenchymal Intracranial pressure monitor, Treatment based on clinical and imaging observations
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 220 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Development and Validation of a Neurological Outcome Prediction Score for Children Requiring Mechanical Ventilation: The NOPS-VC Score.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Optical approaches for neurocritical care: Toward non-invasive recording of cerebral physiology in acute brain injury.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Non-Invasive Intracranial Pressure Monitoring.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Miriam M TreggiariDepartment of Anesthesiology, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle 98104, USA, and Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology, and Intensive Care, Geneva University Hospital, Switzerland. treggmm@u.washington.edu
Nicolas Schutz
N David Yanez
Jacques-Andre Romand
Geneva College · USHarborview Medical Center · USUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRaised intracranial pressure (ICP) has been consistently associated with poor neurological outcome. Our purpose was to systematically review the literature to estimate the association between ICP values and patterns and short- and long-term vital and neurological outcome.

methodsSystematic review of studies identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE Registry search from 1966 to 2005, and reference lists of identified articles, with independent assessment of methodological quality, population, ICP values and patterns, management of raised ICP and neurological outcomes. Summary odds ratios (OR) were calculated for the main outcomes using proportional odds models and logistic regression.

resultsFour prospective studies (409 patients) reported the effect of ICP values, and five studies (677 patients) reported the effect of ICP patterns on neurological outcome. No study reported neurological outcomes beyond 1 year. Relative to normal ICP (<20 mmHg), raised ICP was associated with elevated OR of death: 3.5 [95%CI: 1.7, 7.3] for ICP 20-40, and 6.9 [95%CI: 3.9, 12.4] for ICP>40. Raised but reducible ICP was associated with a 3-4-fold increase in the OR of death or poor neurological outcome. Refractory ICP pattern was associated with a dramatic increase in the relative risk of death (OR 114.3 [95%CI: 40.5, 322.3]).

conclusionsRefractory ICP and response to treatment of raised ICP could be better predictors of neurological outcome than absolute ICP values. Limitations in the design of the studies analyzed precluded identification of the role of ICP monitoring in predicting short- and long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesHumansIntracranial HypertensionIntracranial PressureOutcome Assessment, Health CarePredictive Value of Tests

Identifiers

PMID17522793
OpenAlexW1989133105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.