Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17522789›Full record

Trial reportNeurocritical care2007

Continuous low dose diclofenac sodium infusion to control fever in neurosurgical critical care.

Manuela Cormio, Giuseppe Citerio

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurocritical care, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Modest cooling therapies (35ºC to 37.5ºC) for traumatic brain injury.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. How I manage intracranial hypertension.Critical care (London, England) · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Should we treat pyrexia? And how do we do it?Critical care (London, England) · 2016
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Fever management in SAH.Neurocritical care · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Manuela CormioNeurorianimazione, Dipartimento di Medicina Perioperatoria e Terapie Intensive, Ospedale San Gerardo, Via Pergolesi 33, 20052, Monza, MI, Italy.
Giuseppe Citerio
Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAim of this randomized prospective clinical trial is to compare two methods of antipyretics and evaluate their efficacy in controlling fever during the acute phase of brain damage.

methodsTwenty-two febrile comatose patients: 12 severe traumatic brain injury and 10 subarachnoid hemorrhage divided in 2 groups: Diclofenac low-dose infusion (10 patients) and extemporaneous boluses of NSAIDs (CTRL, 12 patients). The primary outcome measure was length of time with temperature>38 degrees C. Secondary outcome measures were: 1) to assess the effects of each antipyretic strategy on intracranial pressure (ICP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate; 2) to monitor adverse effects of each antipyretic strategy. The baseline characteristics in the two treatment groups were similar.

resultsPrimary findings: percentage of time per patient with temperature>38 degrees C was significantly lower (P<0.0001) in the DCF group, 4% (0-22%), vs. 34% (8-56%) in CTRL group. In addition, mean T degrees , max T degrees were lower in DCF than in CTRL (P<0.05). Secondary findings: CPP and MAP were significantly higher in DCF group (P<0.05) while ICP was not different (NS). However, if ICP pre randomization was <25 mmHg, CTRL suffered a worst ICP (24+/-11 vs. 16+/-7 P=0.01), MAP (89+/-10 vs. 104+/-10 P=0.01) and CPP (75+/-10 vs. 94+/-17 P=0.01) compared to DCF. No differences between the two treatment were recorded when ICP>or=25 mmHg before randomization. There was no gastrointestinal or intracranial bleeding.

conclusionsLow dose DCF infusion is a potential useful strategy for a successful control temperature better than intermittent NSAIDs dosing, minimizing potentially brain-damaging effects of fever.

Indexed as

Critical CareAdultAgedAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBlood PressureBrain InjuriesDiclofenacDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleFeverHumansInfusions, IntravenousIntracranial PressureMaleMiddle AgedSubarachnoid HemorrhageAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDiclofenac

Identifiers

PMID17522789
OpenAlexW1971382807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.