Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17522603›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2008

Second meal effects of dietary calcium and vitamin D.

M J Soares, W Chan She Ping-Delfos

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M J SoaresProgram of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. m.soares@curtin.edu.au
W Chan She Ping-Delfos
Curtin University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the second meal effects of calcium and vitamin D on postprandial glucose, insulin, non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) and glycerol.

methodsEight volunteers aged (mean+/-s.e.m.) 55.5+/-1.2 years and body mass index 29.0+/-1.6 kg/m(2), completed a randomized within-subject design that compared a low calcium-low vitamin D breakfast and an isocaloric high calcium-high vitamin D breakfast (HCB). Four hours following each breakfast, a very low calcium standard lunch was ingested. Serial blood collections were made on the hour over a duration of 8 h. Postprandial responses were calculated as the percentage change (Delta) from the fasting value for breakfast meals, and the 4th hour breakfast value for each lunch, respectively. Non-parametric tests of significance were employed.

resultsThe change in glucose, insulin, serum ionized calcium (iCa(2+)) and intact parathyroid hormone was not different between the two breakfasts, or the two lunches. However, HCB resulted in a lesser suppression of NEFA that significantly carried over to lunch (P=0.036, Wilcoxon test). A similar pattern of change in glycerol did not attain overall statistical significance. DeltaNEFA and Deltaglycerol were related at lunch (Spearman's r=0.52, P=0.04). Relative to breakfast, both lunches resulted in significantly higher glucose and insulin responses (P=0.011, Wilcoxon test).

conclusionsThe data are suggestive of second meal effects of calcium and vitamin D. Our observations of higher glucose and insulin after lunch may include the involvement of second meal factors as well.

Indexed as

Area Under CurveBlood GlucoseBody Mass IndexBone Density Conservation AgentsCalciumCalcium, DietaryCross-Over StudiesFatty Acids, NonesterifiedFemaleGlycerolHumansInsulinLipid MetabolismMaleMiddle AgedPostprandial PeriodBlood GlucoseBone Density Conservation AgentsCalciumCalcium, DietaryFatty Acids, NonesterifiedGlycerolInsulinVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID17522603
OpenAlexW2013498838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.