Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17522509›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery2007

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in colon cancer: a prospective multicenter trial.

Andreas E Bembenek, Robert Rosenberg, Elke Wagler, Stephan Gretschel, Andreas Sendler, Joerg-Ruediger Siewert, Jörg Nährig, Helmut Witzigmann, Johann Hauss, Christian Knorr and 18 more

Open access · greenAbstract readControlled Clinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Dramatic innovations in modern surgical subspecialties.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie · 2010
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. The Value of Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for the Staging of Node-Negative Colon Cancer: Propensity Score and Mediation Analyses.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Andreas E BembenekDepartment of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Robert-Rössle-Klinik, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Campus Buch at HELIOS-Klinikum Berlin, Lindenberger Weg 80, 13125 Berlin, Germany.
Robert Rosenberg
Elke Wagler
Stephan Gretschel
Andreas Sendler
Joerg-Ruediger Siewert
Jörg Nährig
Helmut Witzigmann
Johann Hauss
Christian Knorr
Arno Dimmler
Jörn Gröne
Heinz-Johannes Buhr
Jörg Haier
Hermann Herbst
Juergen Tepel
Bence Siphos
Axel Kleespies
Alfred Koenigsrainer
Nikolas H Stoecklein
Olaf Horstmann
Robert Grützmann
Andreas Imdahl
Daniel Svoboda
Christian Wittekind
Wolfgang Schneider
Klaus-Dieter Wernecke
Peter M Schlag
TUM Klinikum · DEZimmer Biomet (Germany) · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DEUniversity Hospital Münster · DEUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe clinical impact of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in colon cancer is still controversial. The purpose of this prospective multicenter trial was to evaluate its clinical value to predict the nodal status and identify factors that influence these results.

methodsColon cancer patients without prior colorectal surgery or irradiation were eligible. The sentinel lymph node (SLN) was identified intraoperatively by subserosal blue dye injection around the tumor. The SLN underwent step sections and immunohistochemistry (IHC), if classified free of metastases after routine hematoxylin and eosin examination.

resultsAt least one SLN (median, n = 2) was identified in 268 of 315 enrolled patients (detection rate, 85%). Center experience, lymphovascular invasion, body mass index (BMI), and learning curve were positively associated with the detection rate. The false-negative rate to identify pN+ patients by SLNB was 46% (38 of 82). BMI showed a significant association to the false-negative rate (P < 0.0001), the number of tumor-involved lymph nodes was inversely associated. If only slim patients (BMI < or =24) were investigated in experienced centers (>22 patients enrolled), the sensitivity increased to 88% (14 of 16). Moreover, 21% (30 of 141) of the patients, classified as pN0 by routine histopathology, revealed micrometastases or isolated tumor cells (MM/ITC) in the SLN.

conclusionsThe contribution of SLNB to conventional nodal staging of colon cancer patients is still unspecified. Technical problems have to be resolved before a definite conclusion can be drawn in this regard. However, SLNB identifies about one fourth of stage II patients to reveal MM/ITC in lymph nodes. Further studies must clarify the clinical impact of these findings in terms of prognosis and the indication of adjuvant therapy.

Indexed as

Sentinel Lymph Node BiopsyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChi-Square DistributionColonic NeoplasmsColoring AgentsFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryLaparoscopyLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsColoring AgentsRosaniline Dyessulfan blue

Identifiers

PMID17522509
PMCPMC1876954
OpenAlexW2003261841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.