Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17522327›Full record

ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2007

Evaluation of serological tests to identify Trypanosoma cruzi infection in humans and determine cross-reactivity with Trypanosoma rangeli and Leishmania spp.

Zuleima C Caballero, Octavio E Sousa, Waldelania P Marques, Amadeo Saez-Alquezar, Eufrosina S Umezawa

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Stage-InformedMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Characterization of NovelInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  20. Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zuleima C CaballeroInstituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo and Departamento de Medicina Preventiva da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar 470, CEP 05403-000, São Paulo, Brazil.
Octavio E Sousa
Waldelania P Marques
Amadeo Saez-Alquezar
Eufrosina S Umezawa

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Five commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), one in-house ELISA, and two hemagglutination assays were evaluated to determine their diagnostic accuracy for Chagas' disease in two studies. In study 1, ELISA kits showed 100% sensitivity, but specificities ranged from 82.84% to 100% when leishmaniasis cases were included and from 95.57% to 100% when leishmaniasis cases were excluded. Kits using recombinant antigens or synthetic peptides are more specific than those using crude extracts from Trypanosoma cruzi epimastigote forms. Kits evaluated in Panama, in study 2, showed 75% to 100% sensitivity and 97.12% to 100% specificity. These data were obtained by using a Western blot assay with T. cruzi trypomastigote excreted-secreted antigens as a reference test to confirm T. cruzi infection.

Indexed as

Reagent Kits, DiagnosticAnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanChagas DiseaseCross ReactionsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansLeishmaniaRecombinant ProteinsSensitivity and SpecificityTrypanosomaTrypanosoma cruziAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanReagent Kits, DiagnosticRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17522327
PMCPMC2044488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.