Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17522018›Full record

Trial reportLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)2007

Reconsolidation of declarative memory in humans.

Cecilia Forcato, Valeria L Burgos, Pablo F Argibay, Victor A Molina, María E Pedreira, Hector Maldonado

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 229 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Reactivation fails to offer the improvement sleep does.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2025
    Article
  7. New Approaches to Addiction Treatment Based on Learning and Memory.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Temporal dynamics of trauma memory persistence.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Episodic memory enhancement versus impairment is determined by contextual similarity across events.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. The Intersection of Offline Learning and Rehabilitation.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Cecilia ForcatoLaboratorio de Neurobiología de la Memoria, Departamento de Fisiología y Biología Molecular y Celular, IFIBYNE-CONICET, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Valeria L Burgos
Pablo F Argibay
Victor A Molina
María E Pedreira
Hector Maldonado
Fundación Ciencias Exactas y Naturales · ARHospital Italiano de Buenos Aires · ARInstituto Universitario Hospital Italiano · ARUniversidad Nacional de Córdoba · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reconsolidation hypothesis states that a consolidated memory could again become unstable and susceptible to facilitation or impairment for a discrete period of time after a reminder presentation. The phenomenon has been demonstrated in very diverse species and types of memory, including the human procedural memory of a motor skill task but not the human declarative one. Here we provide evidence for both consolidation and reconsolidation in a paired-associate learning (i.e., learning an association between a cue syllable and the respective response syllable). Subjects were given two training sessions with a 24-h interval on distinct verbal material, and afterward, they received at testing two successive retrievals corresponding to the first and second learning, respectively. Two main results are noted. First, the first acquired memory was impaired when a reminder was presented 5 min before the second training (reconsolidation), and also when the second training was given 5 min instead of 24 h after the first one (consolidation). Second, the first retrieval proved to influence negatively on the later one (the retrieval-induced forgetting [RIF] effect), and we used the absence of this RIF effect as a very indicator of the target memory impairment. We consider the demonstration of reconsolidation in human declarative memory as backing the universality of this phenomenon and having potential clinical relevance. On the other hand, we discuss the possibility of using the human declarative memory as a model to address several key topics of the reconsolidation hypothesis.

Indexed as

MemoryPaired-Associate LearningAdultCuesFemaleHumansMaleMental RecallTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID17522018
PMCPMC2216535
OpenAlexW2109582229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.