ReviewCNS drugs2007
Impact of psychotropic medications on simulated driving: a critical review.
Review in CNS drugs, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Driving Performance Under Treatment of Most Frequently Prescribed Drugs for Mental Disorders: A Systematic Review of Patient Studies.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2021Pooled it
- Medication use and the risk of motor vehicle collisions among licensed drivers: A systematic review.Accident; analysis and prevention · 2016Pooled it
- The relationship between benzodiazepine use and traffic accidents: A systematic literature review.CNS drugs · 2010Pooled it
- Driving simulator performance and psychomotor functions of schizophrenic patients treated with antipsychotics.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2009Trial
- Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map.Campbell systematic reviews · 2024Article
- Receipt of Warnings Regarding Potentially Impairing Prescription Medications and Associated Risk Perceptions in a National Sample of U.S. Drivers.Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs · 2017Article
- Prevalence of Self-Reported Prescription Drug Use in a National Sample of U.S. Drivers.Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs · 2017Article
- Development of a test for recording both visual and auditory reaction times, potentially useful for future studies in patients on opioids therapy.Drug design, development and therapy · 2015Article
- Driving on ice: impaired driving skills in current methamphetamine users.Psychopharmacology · 2013Article
- Antipsychotic-induced somnolence in mothers with schizophrenia.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2012Article
- Road traffic accidents and psychotropic medication use in The Netherlands: a case-control study.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2011Article
- Cognitive functioning and driving simulator performance in middle-aged and older adults with HIV.The Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care : JANACArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Driving a motor vehicle is central to the functional autonomy of patients with psychiatric illnesses. There have been many studies of the deleterious effects of psychotropic medications such as benzodiazepines, typical antipsychotics and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) on human motor skills; however, in the literature little attention has been paid to how such impairment affects driving ability. Computerised driving simulators offer a laboratory-based method of assessing the effects of specific psychotropic medications on driving abilities, in a standardised, controlled and safe manner. The purpose of the present article is to review research undertaken to-date on the effects of psychotropic medications on computer-simulated driving. A search of various databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycInfo, was conducted. Forty-one articles assessing the impact of psychotropics on computer-simulated driving were identified. The pooled total number of subjects assessed in these simulator studies was 1336 (mean sample size 30.36 [SD 35.8]). The most common outcome measures in the various studies were speed, steering, deviation from lateral position (tracking, lane drifting), reaction time or braking accuracy, driving errors (e.g. errors in turning, coordination, gap acceptance, signalling, following distance) and vehicle collisions. The results of the studies were quite variable; however, the most common drug-related impairments included those of tracking and reaction time. Benzodiazepines and TCAs were most commonly associated with impairment, although the level of impairment was dependent on the population studied, the dose and the time of testing relative to drug administration. Computer-simulated driving provides a useful tool to research psychotropic-related impairment of driving abilities. Limitations of currently available data include the lack of generalisability, standardisation and small sample sizes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.