Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17521224›Full record

ReviewCNS drugs2007

Long-acting formulations of atypical antipsychotics: time to reconsider when to introduce depot antipsychotics.

Pierre Chue, Robin Emsley

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in CNS drugs, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Plasma levels and estimated dopamine DPsychopharmacology · 2016
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pierre ChueDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. pchue@ualberta.ca
Robin Emsley
Stellenbosch University · ZAUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current availability of a long-acting injectable formulation of risperidone and the potential future availability of long-acting formulations of other atypical antipsychotics (such as paliperidone) should prompt a reconsideration of at what stage in the treatment of schizophrenia such long-acting agents should be introduced. At present, long-acting formulations, particularly of conventional antipsychotics (depots), are usually reserved for patients with chronic schizophrenia who are at high-risk of noncompliance. Recent and increasing data from other patient groups, such as those with first-episode psychosis, suggest that long-acting risperidone is associated with good efficacy and tolerability leading to high patient acceptance, and treatment continuation rates that are greater than with oral antipsychotics. The benefits of an atypical antipsychotic coupled with the assurance of medication delivery in the form of a long-acting injection imply that these novel formulations should be considered in first-episode patients, for whom optimal outcome is frequently compromised by early treatment discontinuation and poor adherence.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsDelayed-Action PreparationsHumansInjectionsSchizophreniaTechnology, PharmaceuticalTreatment OutcomeAntipsychotic AgentsDelayed-Action Preparations

Identifiers

PMID17521224
OpenAlexW14166098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.