Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17519021›Full record

ArticleBMC molecular biology2007

Coordinated regulation of Myc trans-activation targets by Polycomb and the Trithorax group protein Ash1.

Julie M Goodliffe, Michael D Cole, Eric Wieschaus

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC molecular biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. microPublication biology · 2024
    Article
  2. Myc function in Drosophila.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2013
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Trithorax group proteins: switching genes on and keeping them active.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2011
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Julie M GoodliffeDepartment of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. jmgoodli@uncc.edu
Michael D Cole
Eric Wieschaus
Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · USPrinceton University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Charlotte · US

Funding

Myc Oncogene Mutations and Polymorphisms in CancerR01CA080320 · NCI · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI COLE, MICHAEL DAVID · 1999 to 2014
$4.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA080320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Myc oncoprotein is a transcriptional regulator whose function is essential for normal development. Myc is capable of binding to 10% of the mammalian genome, and it is unclear how a developing embryo controls the DNA binding of its abundant Myc proteins in order to avoid Myc's potential for inducing tumorigenesis.

resultsTo identify chromatin binding proteins with a potential role in controlling Myc activity, we established a genetic assay for dMyc activity in Drosophila. We conducted a genome-wide screen using this assay, and identified the Trithorax Group protein Ash1 as a modifier of dMyc activity. Ash1 is a histone methyltransferase known for its role in opposing repression by Polycomb. Using RNAi in the embryo and Affymetrix microarrays, we show that ash1 RNAi causes the increased expression of many genes, suggesting that it is directly or indirectly required for repression in the embryo, in contrast to its known role in maintenance of activation. Many of these genes also respond similarly upon depletion of Pc and pho transcripts, as determined by concurrent microarray analysis of Pc and pho RNAi embryos, suggesting that the three are required for low levels of expression of a common set of targets. Further, many of these overlapping targets are also activated by Myc overexpression. We identify a second group of genes whose expression in the embryo requires Ash1, consistent with its previously established role in maintenance of activation. We find that this second group of Ash1 targets overlaps those activated by Myc and that ectopic Myc overcomes their requirement for Ash1.

conclusionGenetic, genomic and chromatin immunoprecipitation data suggest a model in which Pc, Ash1 and Pho are required to maintain a low level of expression of embryonic targets of activation by Myc, and that this occurs, directly or indirectly, by a combination of disparate chromatin modifications.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalAnimalsChromatin ImmunoprecipitationDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEmbryo, NonmammalianMutationOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPolycomb-Group ProteinsPolycomb Repressive Complex 1Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycRNA InterferenceTranscriptional ActivationTranscription FactorsASH1 protein, DrosophilaDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsPc protein, Drosophilapho protein, DrosophilaPolycomb-Group ProteinsPolycomb Repressive Complex 1Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycPsc protein, DrosophilaTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID17519021
PMCPMC1887537
OpenAlexW1976049735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.