ArticleMalaria journal2007
Deletion mutagenesis of large areas in Plasmodium falciparum genes: a comparative study.
Article in Malaria journal, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- All-in-one construct for genome engineering using Cre-lox technology.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2016Article
- Structural and functional analysis of amphioxus HIFα reveals ancient features of the HIFα family.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2014Article
- Identification of residues required for stalled-ribosome rescue in the codon-independent release factor YaeJ.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- Activation of legumain involves proteolytic and conformational events, resulting in a context- and substrate-dependent activity profile.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology and crystallization communications · 2012Article
- The C-terminus of nucleolin promotes the formation of the c-MYC G-quadruplex and inhibits c-MYC promoter activity.Biochemistry · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe increasing emergence of Plasmodium falciparum parasites resistant to most of the cost-effective drugs has necessitated the identification of novel leads and drug targets. Parasite-specific inserts in enzymes that are essential for the differentiation and proliferation of malarial parasites have received considerable interest since it distinguishes these proteins from their human counterparts. The functions of these inserts, which include mediations of protein activities or protein-protein interactions, are being investigated by several strategies including deletion mutagenesis. A comparative study of five widely used PCR-based mutagenesis methods identified a modified inverse PCR method as particularly suitable for the deletion of large areas (>100 bp) in malaria parasite genes.
methodsThe restriction enzyme-mediated inverse PCR method described here incorporates unique restriction enzyme sites at the 5'-ends of inverse tail-to-tail primers. The entire gene-containing vector is amplified except the desired region to be deleted and cloned using the unique restriction sites to increase ligation efficiency. This method was compared in its efficiency to delete a ~400 bp parasite-specific insert in malarial S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase/ornithine decarboxylase (PfAdoMetDC/ODC) to existing PCR-based site-directed deletion mutagenesis methods including the QuickChange site-directed mutagenesis, ExSite, overlapping primer and inverse PCR. In addition, the modified method was applied in the deletion of a >600 bp parasite-specific insert in another malarial gene, pyridoxal kinase (PfPdxK).
resultsThe modified and optimized restriction enzyme-mediated inverse PCR method resulted in 80% compared to 40% deletion mutagenesis efficiency of the overlapping primer method in the deletion of a large area (411 bp) from a large malaria gene (PfAdoMetDC/ODC, gene size 4257 bp). In contrast, deletion mutagenesis methods such as the well-known QuickChange site-directed mutagenesis, ExSite and inverse PCR methods produced insignificant results. A 100% mutagenesis efficiency was obtained with the restriction enzyme-mediated inverse PCR method to delete 618 bp from a smaller gene (PfPdxK, gene size 1536 bp).
conclusionAn efficient method was developed for the deletion of large areas (>100 bp) in significantly sized genes such as those of the A+T-rich P. falciparum genome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.