Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17518999›Full record

ReviewBMC pulmonary medicine2007

Can asthma control be improved by understanding the patient's perspective?

Rob Horne, David Price, Jen Cleland, Rui Costa, Donna Covey, Kevin Gruffydd-Jones, John Haughney, Svein Hoegh Henrichsen, Alan Kaplan, Arnulf Langhammer and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 210 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Feasibility and acceptability of using bronchial hyperresponsiveness to manage asthma in primary care: a pilot study.Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group · 2012
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Over-the-counter use of short-acting beta-2 agonists: a systematic review.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Alexithymia and asthma: a systematic review.Frontiers in psychology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Insights into how Malaysian adults with limited health literacy self-manage and live with asthma: A Photovoice qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. The Care of Asthma Patients in Communities with Limited Resources.Research and reports in tropical medicine · 2021
    Review

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Rob HorneCentre for Behavioural Medicine, School of Pharmacy University of London, UK. rob.horne@pharmacy.ac.uk
David Price
Jen Cleland
Rui Costa
Donna Covey
Kevin Gruffydd-Jones
John Haughney
Svein Hoegh Henrichsen
Alan Kaplan
Arnulf Langhammer
Anders Østrem
Mike Thomas
Thys van der Molen
J Christian Virchow
Siân Williams
University of Aberdeen · GB657 Oslo · NOAsthma UK · GBNorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Bath · GBUniversity of London · GBUniversity of Rostock · DEYork Central Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical trials show that asthma can be controlled in the majority of patients, but poorly controlled asthma still imposes a considerable burden. The level of asthma control achieved reflects the behaviour of both healthcare professionals and patients. A key challenge for healthcare professionals is to help patients to engage in self-management behaviours with optimal adherence to appropriate treatment. These issues are particularly relevant in primary care, where most asthma is managed. An international panel of experts invited by the International Primary Care Respiratory Group considered the evidence and discussed the implications for primary care practice. DISCUSSION: Causes of poor control: Clinical factors such as exposure to triggers and concomitant rhinitis are important but so are patient behavioural factors. Behaviours such as smoking and nonadherence may reduce the efficacy of treatment and patients' perceptions influence these behaviours. Perceptual barriers to adherence include doubting the need for treatment when symptoms are absent and concerns about potential adverse effects. Under-treatment may also be related to patients' underestimation of the significance of symptoms, and lack of awareness of achievable control. IMPLICATIONS: Three key implications for healthcare professionals emerged from the debate. First, the need for simple tools to assess asthma control. Two approaches considered were the monitoring of biometric markers of control and questionnaires to record patient-reported outcomes. Second, to understand the reasons for poor control for individual patients, identifying both clinical (e.g. rhinitis) and behavioural factors (e.g. smoking and nonadherence to treatment). Third was the need to incorporate, within asthma review, an assessment of patient perspectives including their goals and aspirations and to elicit their beliefs and concerns about asthma and its treatment. This can be used as a basis for agreement between the healthcare professional and patient on a predefined target regarding asthma control and a treatment plan to achieve this. SUMMARY: Optimum review of asthma is essential to improve control. A key priority is the development of simple and effective tools for identifying poor control for individual patients coupled with a tailored approach to treatment to enable patients to set and achieve realistic goals for asthma control.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to HealthPatient-Centered CareAsthmaBiomarkersGoalsHealth BehaviorHumansPopulation SurveillanceSelf CareSurveys and QuestionnairesBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID17518999
PMCPMC1894634
OpenAlexW2024873642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.