ReviewBMC pulmonary medicine2007
Can asthma control be improved by understanding the patient's perspective?
Review in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
75 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 210 citations in OpenAlex.
- Asthma worsenings: approaches to prevention and management from the Asthma Worsenings Working Group.Canadian respiratory journalGuideline
- Canadian Thoracic Society Asthma Management Continuum--2010 Consensus Summary for children six years of age and over, and adults.Canadian respiratory journalGuideline
- Impact of pharmacist-led educational interventions on asthma control and adherence: single-blind, randomised clinical trial.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2021Trial
- 1-year prospective real life monitoring of asthma control and quality of life in Italy.Respiratory research · 2012Trial
- Feasibility and acceptability of using bronchial hyperresponsiveness to manage asthma in primary care: a pilot study.Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group · 2012Trial
- Improved adherence with once-daily versus twice-daily dosing of mometasone furoate administered via a dry powder inhaler: a randomized open-label study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2010Trial
- Exploring patients' perspectives and experiences of asthma self-management: A qualitative study.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026Article
- Quality of life among asthmatic schoolchildren in Saudi Arabia: a mixed-method study.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Educating the patient, controlling the disease: a point prevalence evaluation of structured pharmaceutical asthma care in real world settings.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2026Article
- Community-Engaged, Multi-Method Needs Assessment to Improve Asthma Care Implementation: The Rhode Island Asthma Integrated Response (RI-AIR) Program.Clinical practice in pediatric psychology · 2025Article
- Knowledge, perceptions, facilitators, and barriers towards asthma self-management among patients: A systematic review of the literature.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2025Review
- APPaRENT 3: Asthma Patients' and Physicians' Perspectives on the Burden and Management of Asthma in Seven Countries.Advances in therapy · 2024Article
- Over-the-counter use of short-acting beta-2 agonists: a systematic review.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2023Review
- The ATLAS ASMA Study: Assessing the Impact of Asthma on Patients' Life - The Spanish Patients' Perspective.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2023Article
- Alexithymia and asthma: a systematic review.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Review
- Patient perspectives of the influence of severe and non-severe asthma on their quality of life: A national survey of asthma patients in Spain.The clinical respiratory journal · 2022Article
- Insights into how Malaysian adults with limited health literacy self-manage and live with asthma: A Photovoice qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022Article
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on asthma control among children: a qualitative study from caregivers' perspectives and experiences.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Essential Role of Pharmacists in Asthma Care and Management.Journal of pharmacy practice · 2021Review
- The Care of Asthma Patients in Communities with Limited Resources.Research and reports in tropical medicine · 2021Review
15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical trials show that asthma can be controlled in the majority of patients, but poorly controlled asthma still imposes a considerable burden. The level of asthma control achieved reflects the behaviour of both healthcare professionals and patients. A key challenge for healthcare professionals is to help patients to engage in self-management behaviours with optimal adherence to appropriate treatment. These issues are particularly relevant in primary care, where most asthma is managed. An international panel of experts invited by the International Primary Care Respiratory Group considered the evidence and discussed the implications for primary care practice. DISCUSSION: Causes of poor control: Clinical factors such as exposure to triggers and concomitant rhinitis are important but so are patient behavioural factors. Behaviours such as smoking and nonadherence may reduce the efficacy of treatment and patients' perceptions influence these behaviours. Perceptual barriers to adherence include doubting the need for treatment when symptoms are absent and concerns about potential adverse effects. Under-treatment may also be related to patients' underestimation of the significance of symptoms, and lack of awareness of achievable control. IMPLICATIONS: Three key implications for healthcare professionals emerged from the debate. First, the need for simple tools to assess asthma control. Two approaches considered were the monitoring of biometric markers of control and questionnaires to record patient-reported outcomes. Second, to understand the reasons for poor control for individual patients, identifying both clinical (e.g. rhinitis) and behavioural factors (e.g. smoking and nonadherence to treatment). Third was the need to incorporate, within asthma review, an assessment of patient perspectives including their goals and aspirations and to elicit their beliefs and concerns about asthma and its treatment. This can be used as a basis for agreement between the healthcare professional and patient on a predefined target regarding asthma control and a treatment plan to achieve this. SUMMARY: Optimum review of asthma is essential to improve control. A key priority is the development of simple and effective tools for identifying poor control for individual patients coupled with a tailored approach to treatment to enable patients to set and achieve realistic goals for asthma control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.