Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17517788›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2007

Tentacle probes: eliminating false positives without sacrificing sensitivity.

Brent C Satterfield, Jay A A West, Michael R Caplan

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Surpassing specificity limits of nucleic acid probes via cooperativity.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2010
    Article
  6. Fluorescent probes for live-cell RNA detection.Annual review of biomedical engineering · 2009
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brent C SatterfieldHarrington Department of Bioengineering, Arizona State University Tempe, AZ, USA.
Jay A A West
Michael R Caplan

Funding

Systematic Design of Biomimetic Basement MembranesK22DE014846 · NIDCR · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI CAPLAN, MICHAEL R · 2003 to 2006
$540k
NIDCR NIH HHS K22 DE014846
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The majority of efforts to increase specificity or sensitivity in biosensors result in trade-offs with little to no gain in overall accuracy. This is because a biosensor cannot be more accurate than the affinity interaction it is based on. Accordingly, we have developed a new class of reagents based on mathematical principles of cooperativity to enhance the accuracy of the affinity interaction. Tentacle probes (TPs) have a hairpin structure similar to molecular beacons (MBs) for enhanced specificity, but are modified by the addition of a capture probe for increased kinetics and affinity. They produce kinetic rate constants up to 200-fold faster than MB with corresponding stem strengths. Concentration-independent specificity was observed with no false positives at up to 1 mM concentrations of variant analyte. In contrast, MBs were concentration dependent and experienced false positives above 3.88 muM of variant analyte. The fast kinetics of this label-free reagent may prove important for extraction efficiency, hence sensitivity and detection time, in microfluidic assays. The concentration-independent specificity of TPs may prove extremely useful in assays where starting concentrations and purities are unknown as would be the case in bioterror or clinical point of care diagnostics.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesFalse Positive ReactionsFluorescent DyesKineticsMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesOligonucleotide ProbesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReproducibility of ResultsThermodynamicsFluorescent DyesOligonucleotide Probes

Identifiers

PMID17517788
PMCPMC1904288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.