Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17517767›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2007

DNA topoisomerase II selects DNA cleavage sites based on reactivity rather than binding affinity.

Felix Mueller-Planitz, Daniel Herschlag

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Synthesis of azole-linkedNanoscale advances · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Highly sensitive mapping ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Recurrent mutations in topoisomerase IIα cause a previously undescribed mutator phenotype in human cancers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. DNA cleavage and opening reactions of human topoisomerase IIα are regulated via Mg2+-mediated dynamic bending of gate-DNA.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  17. Article
  18. The DNA-gate of Bacillus subtilis gyrase is predominantly in the closed conformation during the DNA supercoiling reaction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009
    Article
  19. The why and how of DNA unlinking.Nucleic acids research · 2009
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Felix Mueller-PlanitzStanford University, School of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Daniel Herschlag
Stanford University · US

Funding

Study of Nonenzymatic and Enzymatic Phosphoryl TransferR01GM064798 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Polly Morrell Fordyce, DANIEL HERSCHLAG · 2002 to 2026
$5.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM64798NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM064798
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA topoisomerase II modulates DNA topology by relieving supercoil stress and by unknotting or decatenating entangled DNA. During its reaction cycle, the enzyme creates a transient double-strand break in one DNA segment, the G-DNA. This break serves as a gate through which another DNA segment is transported. Defined topoisomerase II cleavage sites in genomic and plasmid DNA have been previously mapped. To dissect the G-DNA recognition mechanism, we studied the affinity and reactivity of a series of DNA duplexes of varied sequence under conditions that only allow G-DNA to bind. These DNA duplexes could be cleaved to varying extents ranging from undetectable (<0.5%) to 80%. The sequence that defines a cleavage site resides within the central 20 bp of the duplex. The DNA affinity does not correlate with the ability of the enzyme to cleave DNA, suggesting that the binding step does not contribute significantly to the selection mechanism. Kinetic experiments show that the selectivity interactions are formed before rather than subsequent to cleavage. Presumably the binding energy of the cognate interactions is used to promote a conformational change that brings the enzyme into a cleavage competent state. The ability to modulate the extent of DNA cleavage by varying the DNA sequence may be valuable for future structural and mechanistic studies that aim to determine topoisomerase structures with DNA bound in pre- and post-cleavage states and to understand the conformational changes associated with DNA binding and cleavage.

Indexed as

Binding SitesDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIKineticsProtein ConformationSubstrate SpecificityThermodynamicsDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Topoisomerases, Type II

Identifiers

PMID17517767
PMCPMC1920260
OpenAlexW2078926413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.