Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17513372›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2007

Biased random walk by stochastic fluctuations of chemoattractant-receptor interactions at the lower limit of detection.

Peter J M van Haastert, Marten Postma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Directed migration of cancer cells: a systems biophysics perspective.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Perspective on Interdisciplinary Approaches on Chemotaxis.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Persistent pseudopod splitting is an effective chemotaxis strategy in shallow gradients.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Memoryless chemotaxis with discrete cues.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Spontaneous signal generation by an excitable system for cell migration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Chemotaxis and autochemotaxis of self-propelling droplet swimmers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Peter J M van HaastertDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, University of Groningen, Haren, The Netherlands. p.j.m.van.haastert@rug.nl
Marten Postma

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Binding of ligand to its receptor is a stochastic process that exhibits fluctuations in time and space. In chemotaxis, this leads to a noisy input signal. Therefore, in a gradient of chemoattractant, the cell may occasionally experience a "wrong" gradient of occupied receptors. We obtained a simple equation for P(pos), the probability that half of the cell closest to the source of chemoattractant has higher receptor occupancy than the opposite half of the cell. P(pos) depends on four factors, the gradient property delC/sq. root of C, the receptor characteristic R(t)/K(D), a time-averaging constant I, and nonreceptor noise sigma(B). We measured chemotaxis of Dictyostelium cells to known shallow gradients of cAMP and obtained direct estimates for these constants. Furthermore, we observed that in shallow gradients, the measured chemotaxis index is correlated with P(pos), which suggests that chemotaxis in shallow gradients is a pure biased random walk. From the observed chemotaxis and derived time-averaging constant, we deduce that the gradient transducing second messenger has a lifetime of 2-8 s and a diffusion rate constant of approximately 1 microm(2)/s. Potential candidates for such second messengers are discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiophysicsCell MovementChemotactic FactorsChemotaxisCyclic AMPDictyosteliumDose-Response Relationship, DrugLigandsMicroscopy, FluorescenceModels, BiologicalModels, StatisticalProbabilitySignal TransductionStochastic ProcessesChemotactic FactorsCyclic AMPLigands

Identifiers

PMID17513372
PMCPMC1948060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.