ArticleBiophysical journal2007
Extracellular proton-modulated pore-blocking effect of the anticonvulsant felbamate on NMDA channels.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The bundle crossing region is responsible for the inwardly rectifying internal spermine block of the Kir2.1 channel.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2014Article
- Ionic flow enhances low-affinity binding: a revised mechanistic view into Mg2+ block of NMDA receptors.The Journal of physiology · 2010Article
- The activation gate and gating mechanism of the NMDA receptor.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2008Article
- Characterization of the gating conformational changes in the felbamate binding site in NMDA channels.Biophysical journal · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Felbamate (FBM) is a potent nonsedative anticonvulsant whose clinical effect is chiefly related to gating modification (and thus use-dependent inhibition) rather than pore block of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) channels at pH 7.4. Using whole-cell recording in rat hippocampal neurons, we examined the effect of extracellular pH on FBM action. In sharp contrast to the findings at pH 7.4, the inhibitory effect of FBM on NMDA currents shows much weakened use-dependence at pH 8.4. Moreover, FBM neither accelerates the activation kinetics of the NMDA channel, nor enhances the currents elicited by very low concentrations of NMDA at pH 8.4. These differential effects of FBM between pH 7.4 and 8.4 are abolished in the mutant NMDA channels which lack proton sensitivity. Most interestingly, the inhibitory effect of FBM becomes flow-dependent and is evidently stronger in inward than in outward NMDA currents at pH 8.4. These findings indicate that FBM has a significantly more manifest pore-blocking effect on the NMDA channel at pH 8.4 than at pH 7.4. FBM therefore acts as an opportunistic pore blocker modulated by extracellular proton, suggesting that the FBM binding site is located at the junction of a widened and a narrow part of the ion conduction pathway. Also, we find that the inhibitory effect of FBM on NMDA currents is antagonized by external but not internal Na+, and that increase of external Na+ decreases the binding rate without altering the unbinding rate of FBM. These findings indicate that the FBM binding site faces the extracellular rather than the intracellular solution, and coincides with the outmost ionic (e.g., Na+) site in the NMDA channel pore. We conclude that the FBM binding site very likely is located in the external pore mouth, where extracellular proton, Na+, FBM, and NMDA channel gating have an orchestrating effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.