Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17510745›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2007

Posterior tibial nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence after partial spinal injury: preliminary report.

B B Mentes, O Yüksel, A Aydin, T Tezcaner, A Leventoğlu, B Aytaç

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Neurostimulation for neurogenic bowel dysfunction.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2013
    Article
  20. Posterior tibial nerve stimulation and faecal incontinence: a review.International journal of colorectal disease · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

B B MentesDepartment of Surgery, Gazi University Medical School, Beşevler 06500 Ankara, Turkey.
O Yüksel
A Aydin
T Tezcaner
A Leventoğlu
B Aytaç
Gazi University · TRKırıkkale University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study evaluated the possible effects of posterior tibial nerve stimulation in two patients with faecal incontinence due to partial spinal cord injury.

methodsPosterior tibial nerve stimulation was performed for 30 min, every other day for 4 weeks, and was then repeated every 2 months for three months. Clinical examination, anorectal physiological work-up, faecal incontinence severity index, and quality of life assessments were performed before and after the treatment.

resultsAfter posterior tibial nerve stimulation, patients showed improvement in rectal sensory threshold, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency, Wexner faecal incontinence score, faecal incontinence severity index, faecal incontinence quality of life scales, resting pressure, and maximum squeeze pressure measurements.

conclusionsPosterior tibial nerve stimulation can be an effective method for the treatment of faecal incontinence caused by partial spinal cord injury.

Indexed as

Tibial NerveElectric Stimulation TherapyFecal IncontinenceFemaleHumansMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSpinal Cord Injuries

Identifiers

PMID17510745
OpenAlexW2003984713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.