ArticleNeuroscience2007
The function of intersegmental connections in determining temporal characteristics of the spinal cord rhythmic output.
Article in Neuroscience, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intersegmental Interactions Give Rise to a Global Network.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2022Article
- Entrainment Ranges for Chains of Forced Neural and Phase Oscillators.Journal of mathematical neuroscience · 2016Article
- Rigidity and Flexibility: The Central Basis of Inter-Leg Coordination in the Locust.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2016Article
- Electrical spiking in bacterial biofilms.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2015Article
- Entrainment ranges of forced phase oscillators.Journal of mathematical biology · 2011Article
- Intersegmental coordination of cockroach locomotion: adaptive control of centrally coupled pattern generator circuits.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2011Article
- Alpha-conotoxin ImI disrupts central control of swimming in the medicinal leech.Neuroscience letters · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent renewed interest in the study of rhythmic behaviors and pattern-generating circuits has been inspired by the currently well-established role of oscillating neuronal networks in all aspects of the function of our nervous system: from sensory integration to central processing, and of course motor control. An integrative rather than reductionist approach in the study of pattern-generating circuits is in accordance with current developments. The lamprey spinal cord, a relatively simple and much-studied preparation, is a useful model for such a study. It is an example of a chain of coupled oscillatory units that is characterized by its ability to demonstrate robust coordinated rhythmic output when isolated in vitro. The preparation allows maximum control over the chemical (neuromodulators and hormones) as well as neuronal environment (sensory and descending inputs) of the single oscillatory unit: the pattern-generating circuit. The current study made use of recently developed tools for nonlinear analysis of time-series, specifically neurophysiological signals. These tools allow us to reveal and characterize biological-functional complexity and information capacity of the neuronal output recorded from the lamprey model network. We focused on the importance of different types of inputs to an oscillatory network and their effect on the network's functional output. We show that the basic circuit, when isolated from short- and long-range neuronal inputs, demonstrates its full potential of information capacity: maximal variation quantities and elevated functional complexity. Morphological and functional constraints result in the network exhibiting only a limited range of the above. This constitutes an important substrate for plasticity in neuronal network function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.