ArticleVirology2007
Oral administration of live virus protects susceptible mice from developing Theiler's virus-induced demyelinating disease.
Article in Virology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Co-infection with a viral pathogen (Theiler's murine encephalomyelitis virus) tended to improve host tolerance but significantly enhanced resistance to Heligmosomoides bakeri.Veterinary research communications · 2026Article
- Excessive Innate Immunity Steers Pathogenic Adaptive Immunity in the Development of Theiler's Virus-Induced Demyelinating Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Isolation, Identification, and Evaluation of the Pathogenicity of a Porcine Enterovirus G Isolated From China.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021Article
- Virus infection, antiviral immunity, and autoimmunity.Immunological reviews · 2013Review
- Anticapsid immunity level, not viral persistence level, correlates with the progression of Theiler's virus-induced demyelinating disease in viral P1-transgenic mice.Journal of virology · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Intracerebral infection of susceptible mouse strains with Theiler's murine encephalomyelitis virus (TMEV) results in an immune-mediated demyelinating disease similar to human multiple sclerosis. TMEV infection is widely spread via fecal-oral routes among wild mouse populations, yet these infected mice rarely develop clinical disease. Oral vaccination has often been used to protect the host against many different infectious agents, although the underlying protective mechanism of prior oral exposure is still unknown. To understand the mechanisms involved in protection from demyelinating disease following previous oral infection, immune parameters and disease progression of mice perorally infected with TMEV were compared with those of mice immunized intraperitoneally following intracerebral infection. Mice infected perorally, but not intraperitoneally, prior to CNS viral infection showed lower chronic viral persistence in the CNS and reduced TMEV-induced demyelinating disease. However, a prolonged period of post-oral infection was necessary for effective protection. Mice orally pre-exposed to the virus displayed markedly elevated levels of antibody response to TMEV in the serum, although T cell responses to TMEV in the periphery were not significantly different between perorally and intraperitoneally immunized mice. In addition, orally vaccinated mice showed higher levels of early CNS-infiltration of B cells producing anti-TMEV antibody as well as virus-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells in the CNS compared to intraperitoneally immunized mice. Therefore, the generation of a sufficient level of protective immune responses appears to require a prolonged time period to confer protection from TMEV-induced demyelinating disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.