Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17506867›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2007

Population pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of alemtuzumab (Campath) in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and its link to treatment response.

D R Mould, A Baumann, J Kuhlmann, M J Keating, S Weitman, P Hillmen, L R Brettman, S Reif, P L Bonate

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

D R MouldProjections Research, Phoenixville, PA, USA.
A Baumann
J Kuhlmann
M J Keating
S Weitman
P Hillmen
L R Brettman
S Reif
P L Bonate

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo characterize alemtuzumab pharmacokinetics and its exposure-response relationship with white blood cell (WBC) count in patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL).

methodsNonlinear mixed effects models were used to characterize plasma concentration-time data and WBC count-time data from 67 patients. Logistic regression was used to relate summary measures of drug exposure to tumour response.

resultsAlemtuzumab pharmacokinetics were best characterized by a two-compartment model with nonlinear elimination where V(max) (microg h(-1)) was [1020 x (WBC count/10 x 10(9) l(-1))(0.194)], K(m) was 338 microg l(-1), V(1) was 11.3 l, Q was 1.05 l h(-1) and V(2) was 41.5 l. Intersubject variability (ISV) in V(max), K(m), V(1) and V(2) was 32%, 145%, 84% and 179%, respectively. The reduction in WBC over time was modelled by a stimulatory loss indirect response model with values of 18.2 for E(max), 306 microg l(-1) for EC(50), 1.56 x 10(9) cells l(-1) h(-1) for K(in) and 0.029 per h for K(out). The probability of achieving a complete or partial response was >/=50% when the maximal trough concentration exceeded 13.2 microg ml(-1) or when AUC(0-tau) exceeded 484 microg h(-1) ml(-1).

conclusionsAlemtuzumab displayed time- and concentration-dependent pharmacokinetics with large interpatient variability, both in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, which was probably reflective of differences in tumour burden among patients. A direct relationship between maximal trough concentrations and clinical outcomes was observed, with increasing alemtuzumab exposure resulting in a greater probability of positive tumour response.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAlemtuzumabAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, NeoplasmAntineoplastic AgentsDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellLeukocyte CountLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedAlemtuzumabAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, NeoplasmAntineoplastic AgentsImmunoglobulin G

Identifiers

PMID17506867
PMCPMC2000651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.