SynthesisClinical drug investigation2007
Economic burden of haematological adverse effects in cancer patients: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Clinical drug investigation, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimal first-line chemotherapeutic treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic esophagogastric carcinoma: triplet versus doublet chemotherapy: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of 3 mg pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as support to chemotherapy for lung cancer.Thoracic cancer · 2022Trial
- Exploratory composite endpoint demonstrates benefit of trilaciclib across multiple clinically meaningful components of myeloprotection in patients with small cell lung cancer.International journal of cancer · 2021Trial
- Trial
- Article
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of chemotherapy-induced adverse drug reactions among children with cancer in Africa.Infectious agents and cancer · 2025Review
- Burden of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression (CIM) in Chinese patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC): A retrospective real-world study.Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine · 2025Article
- Severe temozolomide-induced thrombocytopenia is linked to increased healthcare utilization in glioblastoma and disproportionally impacts female patients.Neuro-oncology practice · 2025Article
- Observational
- Persistent Thrombocytopenia of an Unexplained Cause in a Patient With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report.Cureus · 2024Article
- Molecular targeted therapies for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: recent developments and clinical implications.EXCLI journal · 2024Review
- Association between Area under the Curve Estimated from Carboplatin Dose and Incidence of Severe Thrombocytopenia in Patients with Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma on DeVIC Therapy.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023Article
- Burden of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression among patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study from community oncology practices.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Disparities in the consensus for treatment of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia.Ecancermedicalscience · 2023Article
- Resource Use and Costs Related to Hematological Complications of Chemotherapy: Cost of Illness Study Based on Data from Balkan Country with Recent History of Socioeconomic Transition.Iranian journal of public health · 2022Article
- Exploring Cost-Effectiveness of the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in Geriatric Oncology: A Narrative Review.Cancers · 2022Review
- Cost-effectiveness and value of information analyses of Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma in the United States.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2022Article
- Budget impact analysis of trilaciclib for decreasing the incidence of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer in the United States.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2022Article
- Redefine the Role of Proton Beam Therapy for the Locally-Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Assisting the Reduction of Acute Hematologic Toxicity.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Avelumab Maintenance Therapy Plus Best Supportive Care vs. Best Supportive Care Alone for Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePatients receiving cancer treatments commonly experience haematological adverse effects (AEs) related to chemotherapy or molecularly targeted therapies, which may be associated with high healthcare costs. The objective of this review was to summarise the published literature on the economic burden of neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anaemia as AEs of cancer treatment.
methodsA systematic search of the medical literature published between 1990 and 2006 was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, related article links and supplemental searches. References selected for inclusion were prospective or retrospective studies specifically designed to examine the burden of illness, direct medical costs, indirect costs and/or cost drivers associated with neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anaemia in adult cancer patients. All costs are reported as originally published and adjusted to 2006 US dollars.
resultsIn the US, the cost of neutropenia ranged from $US 1893 (2006 value $US 2632) per outpatient episode to $US 38,583 ($US 49,917) per febrile neutropenia hospitalisation. For countries outside the US, the cost of neutropenia appeared to be lower. The cost of thrombocytopenia ranged from $US 1035 ($US 1395) to $US 5328 ($US 7635) per cycle or episode in the US. Costs attributable to anaemia ranged from $US 18,418 ($US 22,775) to $US 69,478 ($US 93,454) per year in the US. The costs of AEs for patients with haematological malignancies appeared to be up to 2-3 times higher than those for patients with solid tumours. Economic studies of the cost of haematological AEs specific to new molecularly targeted treatments for haematological malignancy have not been published.
conclusionsChemotherapy-related haematological AEs result in a substantial economic burden on patients, payers, caregivers and society in general. Because of their burden, the frequency and severity of these toxicities should be one of the key factors in the selection of optimal treatments for patients with cancer, especially those with haematological malignancies. Future research is needed to assess the economic burden of AEs associated with new molecularly targeted treatments for haematological malignancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.