ArticleSao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina2007
Multidimensional pain assessment of preterm newborns at the 1st, 3rd and 7th days of life.
Article in Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methodological Issues in the Study of the Development of Pain Responsivity in Preterm Neonates: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Pooled it
- Oral glucose for pain relief during examination for retinopathy of prematurity: a masked randomized clinical trial.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2013Trial
- Using sensor-fusion and machine-learning algorithms to assess acute pain in non-verbal infants: a study protocol.BMJ open · 2021Article
- [Pain assessment scales in newborns: integrative review].Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2014Review
- Progress in pain assessment: the cognitively compromised patient.Current opinion in anaesthesiology · 2008Review
- Face-based automatic pain assessment: challenges and perspectives in neonatal intensive care units.Jornal de pediatriaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CONTEXT AND
objectiveIt is challenge to assess and treat pain in premature infants. The objective of this study was to compare the multidimensional pain assessment of preterm neonates subjected to an acute pain stimulus at 24 hours, 72 hours and seven days of life. DESIGN AND
settingProspective cohort study, at Universidade Federal de São Paulo.
methodsEleven neonates with gestational age less than 37 weeks that needed venepuncture for blood collection were studied. The exclusion criteria were Apgar score < 7 at five minutes, presence of any central nervous system abnormality, and discharge or death before seven days of life. Venepuncture was performed in the dorsum of the hand, and the heart rate, oxygen saturation and pain scales [Neonatal Facial Coding System (NFCS), Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS), and Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP)] were assessed at 24 hours, 72 hours and 7 days of life. NFCS and NIPS were evaluated prior to procedure (Tpre), during venepuncture (T0), and two (T2) and five (T5) minutes after needle withdrawal. Heart rate, O2 saturation and PIPP were measured at Tpre and T0. Mean values were compared by repeated-measurement analysis of variance.
resultsThe pain parameters did not differ at 24 hours, 72 hours and 7 days of life: heart rate (p = 0.22), oxygen saturation (p = 0.69), NFCS (p = 0.40), NIPS (p = 0.32) and PIPP (p = 0.56).
conclusionHomogeneous pain scores were observed following venepuncture in premature infants during their first week of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.