ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2007
Immunology of anaphylaxis: lessons from murine models.
Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a BALB/c mouse model for food allergy: comparison of allergy-related responses to peanut agglutinin, β-lactoglobulin and potato acid phosphatase.Toxicology research · 2017Article
- Understanding the mechanisms of anaphylaxis.Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of animal models is increasing, and mice are suitable animals to use in exploring systemic anaphylaxis based on the similarity between human and mouse immune systems. Two anaphylaxis pathways have been characterized in mice, which may help in understanding some of the discrepancies found in humans. In addition, cytokine studies are raising new concepts that may put together some of the puzzling mechanisms described in this disease. Finally, the study of the mechanisms that parasitic infections use to evade the human immune system and the scene in which a parasite induces clinical anaphylaxis are opening new insights in the immunology pathways and new strategies to fight against this exclusive disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.