Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17503898›Full record

ArticleDrugs & aging2007

Age-related differences in the prevalence of potential drug-drug interactions in ambulatory dyslipidaemic patients treated with statins.

Sabin S Egger, Alexandra E Rätz Bravo, Lorenzo Hess, Raymond G Schlienger, Stephan Krähenbühl

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs & aging, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Comparing Important and Well-documented Potential Drug-Drug Interactions between Emergency, Medical, and Surgical ICUs of a Respiratory Referral Center.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A Prospective Analysis of Drug Interactions in Patients of Intensive Cardiac Care Unit.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2017
    Article
  13. Assessment of potential drug-drug interactions and its associated factors in the hospitalized cardiac patients.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Sabin S EggerClinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Alexandra E Rätz Bravo
Lorenzo Hess
Raymond G Schlienger
Stephan Krähenbühl
Hospital Base · CLSoftware (Spain) · ESUniversity Hospital of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveElderly patients may be at higher risk of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) because of polypharmacy. This study evaluated age-specific differences in the prevalence of clinically relevant potential DDIs (pDDIs) in ambulatory dyslipidaemic patients treated with an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin). We hypothesised that elderly patients are at higher risk for pDDIs because of the presence of more drugs and drugs with a higher potential for DDIs in this age group.

methodsA total of 2742 dyslipidaemic ambulatory patients treated with a statin were included in this cross-sectional study. Drug treatment was screened for clinically relevant pDDIs using an electronic drug interaction program (DRUG-REAX System).

resultsThe study sample consisted of 483 (17.6%) patients aged < or = 54 years, 732 (26.7%) aged 55-64 years, 924 (33.7%) aged 65-74 years and 603 (22.0%) patients aged > or = 75 years. Patients > or =75 years had significantly more pharmacologically active substances prescribed than patients aged < or =54 years (mean 5.8 vs 3.8, respectively; p < 0.001). Cardiovascular diseases such as coronary heart disease, heart failure or arrhythmias were also significantly more prevalent in patients aged > or = 75 years than in younger patients. The overall prevalence of pDDIs increased significantly from 7.9% in those aged < or = 54 years to 18.4% in patients aged > or = 75 years (p < 0.001). The frequency of both pDDIs associated with statins and non-statin pDDIs increased with age. Risk factors for pDDIs in patients aged > or = 75 years were arrhythmias, heart failure and the number of pharmacologically active substances prescribed. The more frequent prescription of cardiovascular drugs with a high potential for pDDIs (e.g. amiodarone and digoxin) in patients aged > or = 75 years was mainly responsible for the observed increases in statin and non-statin pDDIs in this age group.

conclusionsCompared with younger patients, elderly dyslipidaemic patients are at a higher risk for clinically relevant pDDIs, mainly because of a higher number of drugs prescribed. In addition, patients aged > or = 75 years were prescribed more drugs with a high potential for DDIs, especially drugs used for the treatment of arrhythmias and heart failure. The risk for adverse reactions associated with pDDIs may often be reduced by dose adjustment, close monitoring or selection of an alternative drug.

Indexed as

Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPharmaceutical PreparationsAgedAge FactorsComorbidityCross-Sectional StudiesDrug InteractionsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsDrug Therapy, CombinationDyslipidemiasFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID17503898
OpenAlexW2060477105

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.