Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17502848›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2007

Augmentation of spinal morphine analgesia and inhibition of tolerance by low doses of mu- and delta-opioid receptor antagonists.

N S Abul-Husn, M Sutak, B Milne, K Jhamandas

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Opioid Analgesia and Opioid-Induced Adverse Effects: A Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. An integrated quantitative proteomics and systems biology approach to explore synaptic protein profile changes during morphine exposure.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2014
    Review
  13. Identification of a μ-δ opioid receptor heteromer-biased agonist with antinociceptive activity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  14. Disease-specific heteromerization of G-protein-coupled receptors that target drugs of abuse.Progress in molecular biology and translational science · 2013
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N S Abul-HusnDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
M Sutak
B Milne
K Jhamandas
Queen's University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeUltralow doses of naltrexone, a non-selective opioid antagonist, have previously been found to augment acute morphine analgesia and block the development of tolerance to this effect. Since morphine tolerance is dependent on the activity of micro and delta receptors, the present study investigated the effects of ultralow doses of antagonists selective for these receptor types on morphine analgesia and tolerance in tests of thermal and mechanical nociception. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Effects of intrathecal administration of mu-receptor antagonists, CTOP (0.01 ng) or CTAP (0.001 ng), or a delta-receptor antagonist, naltrindole (0.01 ng), on spinal morphine analgesia and tolerance were evaluated using the tail-flick and paw-pressure tests in rats. KEY

resultsBoth micro and delta antagonists augmented analgesia produced by a sub-maximal (5 microg) or maximal (15 microg) dose of morphine. Administration of the antagonists with morphine (15 microg) for 5 days inhibited the progressive decline of analgesia and prevented the loss of morphine potency. In animals exhibiting tolerance to morphine, administration of the antagonists with morphine produced a recovery of the analgesic response and restored morphine potency. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Combining ultralow doses of micro- or delta-receptor antagonists with spinal morphine augmented the acute analgesic effects, inhibited the induction of chronic tolerance and reversed established tolerance. The remarkably similar effects of micro- and delta-opioid receptor antagonists on morphine analgesia and tolerance are interpreted in terms of blockade of the latent excitatory effects of the agonist that limit expression of its full activity.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidAnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug InteractionsDrug ToleranceInjections, SpinalMaleMorphineNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsPainPain MeasurementPeptide FragmentsPeptidesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyAnalgesics, OpioidCTAP octapeptideMorphineNaltrexonenaltrindoleNarcotic AntagonistsPeptide FragmentsPeptidesphenylalanyl-cyclo(cysteinyltyrosyl-tryptophyl-ornithyl-threonyl-penicillamine)threoninamideReceptors, Opioid, deltaReceptors, Opioid, muSomatostatin

Identifiers

PMID17502848
PMCPMC2014123
OpenAlexW2047644719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.