Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17502046›Full record

ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2007

Outcome measures in systemic sclerosis: an update on instruments and current research.

Dinesh Khanna, Peter A Merkel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dinesh KhannaDivision of Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati, PO Box 670563, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0563, USA. dinesh.khanna@uc.edu
Peter A Merkel

Funding

Ohio Interdisciplinary Women's Health Career TrainingK12HD051953 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI TSEVAT, JOEL · 2005 to 2014
$4.2M
Studies in Scleroderma and Cystic Fibrosis OsteoporosisK24AR002224 · NIAMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI MERKEL, PETER A · 2001 to 2005
$609k
NIAMS NIH HHS K24 AR2224-01A1NICHD NIH HHS HD051953
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substantial progress has been made in the past 10 years in the development and validation of outcome measures and refinement of trial methodology for systemic sclerosis (scleroderma, SSc). These advances in outcome measures have focused mostly on specific organ systems involved in SSc. Many of these new tools have been validated and subsequently adapted for use in multicenter clinical trials. Newer outcome measures in development are intended to more precisely quantify clinically meaningful change in specific organ systems, and some methods aim to assess overall disease burden in SSc. This review provides an update on currently used outcome measures in SSc with specific attention on newer tools and also describes methodology under development.

Indexed as

Scleroderma, SystemicClinical Trials as TopicHealth Status IndicatorsHumansTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.