Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17496022›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2007

Two-state model of acto-myosin attachment-detachment predicts C-process of sinusoidal analysis.

Bradley M Palmer, Takeki Suzuki, Yuan Wang, William D Barnes, Mark S Miller, David W Maughan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Mavacamten decreases maximal force and CaAmerican journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2021
    Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bradley M PalmerDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA. palmer@physiology.med.uvm.edu
Takeki Suzuki
Yuan Wang
William D Barnes
Mark S Miller
David W Maughan

Funding

Ventricular and Cardiac Fiber Characterization and Integration CoreP01HL059408 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT &ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI WARSHAW, DAVID M · 1999 to 2014
$26.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL059408NHLBI NIH HHS P01-HL59408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The force response of activated striated muscle to length perturbations includes the so-called C-process, which has been considered the frequency domain representation of the fast single-exponential force decay after a length step (phases 1 and 2). The underlying molecular mechanisms of this phenomenon, however, are still the subject of various hypotheses. In this study, we derived analytical expressions and created a corresponding computer model to describe the consequences of independent acto-myosin cross-bridges characterized solely by 1), intermittent periods of attachment (t(att)) and detachment (t(det)), whose values are stochastically governed by independent probability density functions; and 2), a finite Hookian stiffness (k(stiff)) effective only during periods of attachment. The computer-simulated force response of 20,000 (N) cross-bridges making up a half-sarcomere (F(hs)(t)) to sinusoidal length perturbations (L(hs)(t)) was predicted by the analytical expression in the frequency domain, (F(hs)(omega)/L(hs)(omega))=(t(att)/t(cycle))Nk(stiff)(iomega/(t(att)(-1)+iomega)), where t(att) = mean value of t(att), t(cycle) = mean value of t(att) + t(det), k(stiff) = mean stiffness, and omega = 2pi x frequency of perturbation. The simulated force response due to a length step (L(hs)) was furthermore predicted by the analytical expression in the time domain, F(hs)(t)=(t(att)/t(cycle))Nk(stiff)L(hs)e(-t/t(att)). The forms of these analytically derived expressions are consistent with expressions historically used to describe these specific characteristics of a force response and suggest that the cycling of acto-myosin cross-bridges and their associated stiffnesses are responsible for the C-process and for phases 1 and 2. The rate constant 2pic, i.e., the frequency parameter of the historically defined C-process, is shown here to be equal to t(att)(-1). Experimental results from activated cardiac muscle examined at different temperatures and containing predominately alpha- or beta-myosin heavy chain isoforms were found to be consistent with the above interpretation.

Indexed as

ActomyosinComputer SimulationElasticityKineticsModels, BiologicalMuscle, SkeletalMyosinsProbabilityProtein BindingSarcomeresUser-Computer InterfaceActomyosinMyosins

Identifiers

PMID17496022
PMCPMC1913148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.