ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2007
Prediction of the jugular venous waveform using a model of CSF dynamics.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Seven Mathematical Models of Hemorrhagic Shock.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2021Review
- Extracranial versus intracranial hydro-hemodynamics during aging: a PC-MRI pilot cross-sectional study.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2020Article
- Changes in intracranial venous blood flow and pulsatility in Alzheimer's disease: A 4D flow MRI study.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2017Article
- Computational Modeling of Venous Sinus Stenosis in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2016Article
- Venous hemodynamics in neurological disorders: an analytical review with hydrodynamic analysis.BMC medicine · 2013Review
- A mathematical model of blood, cerebrospinal fluid and brain dynamics.Journal of mathematical biology · 2009Article
- Influence of the compliance of the neck arteries and veins on the measurement of intracranial volume change by phase-contrast MRI.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2009Article
- Potential surrogate markers of cerebral microvascular angiopathy in asymptomatic subjects at risk of stroke.European radiology · 2009Article
- The venous manifestations of pulse wave encephalopathy: windkessel dysfunction in normal aging and senile dementia.Neuroradiology · 2008Article
- Changing concepts of cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics: role of phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and implications for cerebral microvascular disease.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2007Review
- Cerebrospinal Fluid Dynamics in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: The Role of Phase-Contrast MRI in the Differential Diagnosis of Active and Chronic Disease.Korean journal of radiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeWe have previously reported a model of cerebral hydrodynamics in the form of an equivalent electrical circuit. The aim of this work was to demonstrate that the model could predict venous flow patterns seen in the superior sagittal sinus (SSS), straight sinus (STS), and jugular vein (JV) in normal volunteers. MATERIALS AND
methodsAn electrical equivalence model of CSF and cerebral blood flow was fitted to measured arterial and CSF data from 16 healthy volunteers. Predictions of the venous outflow waveform derived from the model were compared with measured venous flows in the SSS, STS, and JV.
resultsThe model accurately predicted the measured jugular waveform. The measured waveforms from SSS and STS showed a less pronounced and delayed systolic peak compared with the predicted outflow. The fitted bulk model parameters provided relative values that correspond approximately to the impedance of arterial capillaries (1.0), cerebral aqueduct ( approximately 0), venous capillaries ( approximately 0), and arteries (0.01) and for the elastic capacitance of the ventricles (4.11), capillaries ( approximately 0), and veins (271). The elastic capacitance of the major cerebral arteries was large and could not be accurately determined.
conclusionsWe have confirmed the ability of the model to predict the venous waveforms in healthy persons. The absence of any statistically significant component of the venous waveform not described by the model implies that measurements of venous flow could be used to constrain further the model-fitting process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17494684PMC8134341What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.