ArticleBMC bioinformatics2007
Model order selection for bio-molecular data clustering.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cross-Study Replicability in Cluster Analysis.Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics · 2023Article
- Critical limitations of consensus clustering in class discovery.Scientific reports · 2014Article
- Article
- Article
- Speeding up the Consensus Clustering methodology for microarray data analysis.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2011Article
- Sublineage structure analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains using multiple-biomarker tensors.BMC genomics · 2011Article
- Merged consensus clustering to assess and improve class discovery with microarray data.BMC bioinformatics · 2010Article
- EMA - A R package for Easy Microarray data analysis.BMC research notes · 2010Article
- Dynamically weighted clustering with noise set.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2010Article
- caBIG VISDA: modeling, visualization, and discovery for cluster analysis of genomic data.BMC bioinformatics · 2008Article
- Discovering multi-level structures in bio-molecular data through the Bernstein inequality.BMC bioinformatics · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCluster analysis has been widely applied for investigating structure in bio-molecular data. A drawback of most clustering algorithms is that they cannot automatically detect the "natural" number of clusters underlying the data, and in many cases we have no enough "a priori" biological knowledge to evaluate both the number of clusters as well as their validity. Recently several methods based on the concept of stability have been proposed to estimate the "optimal" number of clusters, but despite their successful application to the analysis of complex bio-molecular data, the assessment of the statistical significance of the discovered clustering solutions and the detection of multiple structures simultaneously present in high-dimensional bio-molecular data are still major problems.
resultsWe propose a stability method based on randomized maps that exploits the high-dimensionality and relatively low cardinality that characterize bio-molecular data, by selecting subsets of randomized linear combinations of the input variables, and by using stability indices based on the overall distribution of similarity measures between multiple pairs of clusterings performed on the randomly projected data. A chi2-based statistical test is proposed to assess the significance of the clustering solutions and to detect significant and if possible multi-level structures simultaneously present in the data (e.g. hierarchical structures).
conclusionThe experimental results show that our model order selection methods are competitive with other state-of-the-art stability based algorithms and are able to detect multiple levels of structure underlying both synthetic and gene expression data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.