Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17492401›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuro-oncology2007

[11C] methionine and [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose PET in the follow-up of glioblastoma multiforme.

Christian Pötzi, Alexander Becherer, Christine Marosi, Georgios Karanikas, Monika Szabo, Robert Dudczak, Kurt Kletter, Susanne Asenbaum

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Multimodality Brain Tumor Imaging: MR Imaging, PET, and PET/MR Imaging.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2015
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Value of 11C-methionine PET in imaging brain tumours and metastases.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2013
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Advances in MRI assessment of gliomas and response to anti-VEGF therapy.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2011
    Review
  12. Is there a place for FET PET in the initial evaluation of brain lesions with unknown significance?European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2010
    Article
  13. Clinical impact of (11)C-methionine PET on expected management of patients with brain neoplasm.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2010
    Article
  14. The use of PET scan in glioblastoma multiforme.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christian PötziDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Alexander Becherer
Christine Marosi
Georgios Karanikas
Monika Szabo
Robert Dudczak
Kurt Kletter
Susanne Asenbaum
Medical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate the value of [11C] methionine (MET) and [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET in the follow-up of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). PATIENTS AND

methodsAfter surgical and/or conservative treatment, 28 patients (pts) with GBM underwent FDG and MET PET on average 12.7 months after the diagnosis had been established. Scans were evaluated visually and by calculating the maximal tumor SUV as well as the ratio of tumor vs. contralateral region (RTu). The degree of tracer uptake was compared with survival time, disease duration and MRI findings.

resultsThe mean overall duration of survival was 12.7 months. The patients were divided into two groups: those that survived less than 12 months and those that survived longer than 12 months. Focally increased uptake was revealed by MET PET in 24 patients and by FDG PET in 2 patients. On MRI scans, viable tumor tissue was suspected in 18 patients. No correlations were registered between FDG/MET uptake and survival time or disease duration respectively; Kaplan-Meier calculations were negative in this regard. Similarly, negative results were obtained in subgroups of patients who had undergone microsurgical resection and whose disease was at least of 6 months' duration, and additionally in a subgroup who had undergone their last treatment longer than 6 months ago. With respect to survival groups, a positive MET PET was associated with a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 8%. SUV and RTu values did not differ between patients with positive or negative MRI results.

conclusionsIn this study FDG PET seems to be of limited value in the work-up of recurrent GBM because of its lower sensitivity than MET PET and the fact that it allows no prediction of the outcome. MET PET visualizes viable tumor tissue without adding any prognostic information and appears to be in no way superior to conventional imaging.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18MethioninePositron-Emission TomographyBrain NeoplasmsCarbon RadioisotopesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlioblastomaHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRadiopharmaceuticalsSensitivity and SpecificitySurvival RateCarbon RadioisotopesFluorodeoxyglucose F18MethionineRadiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID17492401
OpenAlexW2069079470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.