Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17492303›Full record

SynthesisInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2007

A meta-analysis of occupational trichloroethylene exposure and liver cancer.

Dominik D Alexander, Michael A Kelsh, Pamela J Mink, Jeffrey H Mandel, Rupa Basu, Michal Weingart

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Assessment of risk factors, and racial and ethnic differences in hepatocellular carcinoma.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2020
    Review
  4. Update in global trends and aetiology of hepatocellular carcinoma.Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2018
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Evaluation of biomarkers assessing regular alcohol consumption in an occupational setting.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2016
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dominik D AlexanderExponent Health Sciences, 185 Hansen Ct, Suite 100, Wood Dale, IL 60191, USA. dalexander@exponent.com
Michael A Kelsh
Pamela J Mink
Jeffrey H Mandel
Rupa Basu
Michal Weingart

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFindings from epidemiologic studies of trichloroethylene (TCE) exposure and liver cancer have been inconsistent. To quantitatively evaluate this association and to examine sources of heterogeneity, we conducted a meta-analysis of occupational studies of TCE exposure and liver/biliary tract cancer.

methodsWe identified 14 occupational cohort studies of TCE exposed workers and one case-control study that met our inclusion criteria. Nine studies specifically identified TCE as a workplace exposure, and were classified as Group I cohort studies. Subcohorts of workers, identified within eight of these studies as more likely exposed to TCE than the total cohort, were analyzed separately.

resultsThe combined liver/biliary cancer summary relative risk estimate (SRRE) for all studies was 1.08 (95% CI 0.91-1.29; heterogeneity (H)-P-value=0.12). For the total study populations in the Group I cohorts, the SRRE was 1.14 (95% CI 0.93-1.39; H-P-value=0.05) and for the subcohorts, the SRRE was 1.30 (95% CI 1.09-1.55). Within this subcohort analysis, the association for the European studies of workers from various industries (SRRE=1.38; based on four studies) was higher than the association for the US studies of aerospace and aircraft workers (SRRE=0.97, based on four studies).

conclusionAlthough positive associations were observed for some analyses, results were inconsistent across occupational groups (aerospace/aircraft vs. other industries combined), study location, and incidence versus mortality endpoints. In addition, exposure-response trends were not observed consistently across studies. Interpretation is also limited by the potential impact of uncontrolled confounding by other occupational or lifestyle exposures such as smoking or alcohol consumption. Given these limitations, the currently available epidemiologic data are not sufficient to support a causal relation between occupational TCE exposure and liver/biliary cancer.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesCohort StudiesHumansLiver NeoplasmsOccupational ExposureTrichloroethyleneTrichloroethylene

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.