Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17490942›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2007

The pluses and minuses of R0.

M G Roberts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Estimation of basic reproduction number (RFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  7. Pathogens Spillover from Honey Bees to Other Arthropods.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  8. What the reproductive number RTheoretical population biology · 2021
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Complexity of the Basic Reproduction Number (REmerging infectious diseases · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Bi-logistic model for disease dynamics caused byRoyal Society open science · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. From within-host interactions to epidemiological competition: a general model for multiple infections.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

M G RobertsCentre for Mathematical Biology, Institute of Information and Mathematical Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 102 904, North Shore Mail Centre, Auckland, New Zealand. m.g.roberts@massey.ac.nz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of the basic reproduction number (R0) occupies a central place in epidemic theory. The value of R0 determines the proportion of the population that becomes infected over the course of a (modelled) epidemic. In many models, (i) an endemic infection can persist only if R0>1, (ii) the value of R0 provides a direct measure of the control effort required to eliminate the infection, and (iii) pathogens evolve to maximize their value of R0. These three statements are not universally true. In this paper, some exceptions to them are discussed, based on the extensions of the SIR model.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalModels, StatisticalAnimal DiseasesAnimalsAnimals, WildCommunicable DiseasesDisease Transmission, Infectious

Identifiers

PMID17490942
PMCPMC2075534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.