Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17488767›Full record

ArticleHeart (British Cardiac Society)2007

Assessment of intravascular and extravascular mechanisms of myocardial perfusion abnormalities in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy by myocardial contrast echocardiography.

Osama I I Soliman, Paul Knaapen, Marcel L Geleijnse, Pieter A Dijkmans, Ashraf M Anwar, Attila Nemes, Michelle Michels, Wim B Vletter, Adriaan A Lammertsma, Folkert J ten Cate

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Mechanisms and prognostic impact of myocardial ischaemia in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2023
    Review
  8. Coronary microvascular disease in hypertrophic and infiltrative cardiomyopathies.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Clinical topic: Nuclear imaging in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2015
    Review
  13. Aortic biomechanics in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Global cardiology science & practice · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Osama I I SolimanDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Paul Knaapen
Marcel L Geleijnse
Pieter A Dijkmans
Ashraf M Anwar
Attila Nemes
Michelle Michels
Wim B Vletter
Adriaan A Lammertsma
Folkert J ten Cate
Erasmus University Rotterdam · NLAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess mechanisms of myocardial perfusion impairment in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).

methodsFourteen patients with obstructive HCM (mean (SD) age 53 (10) years, 11 men) underwent intravenous adenosine myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE), positron emission tomography (PET) and cardiac catheterisation. Fourteen healthy volunteers (mean age 31 (4) years, 11 men) served as controls. Relative myocardial blood volume (rBV), exchange flow velocity (beta), myocardial blood flow (MBF), MBF reserve (MFR) and endocardial-to-subepicardial (endo-to-epi) MBF ratio were measured from the steady state and contrast replenishment time-intensity curves.

resultsPatients with HCM had lower rest MBF (for LVRPP-corrected)--mean (SD) (0.92 (0.12) vs 1.13 (0.25) ml/min/g, p<0.01)--and hyperaemic MBF--(2.56 (0.49) vs 4.34 (0.78) ml/min/g, p<0.01) than controls. Resting rBV was lower in patients with HCM (0.094 (0.016) vs 0.138 (0.014) ml/ml), and during hyperaemia (0.104 (0.018) ml/ml vs 0.185 (0.024) ml/ml) (all p<0.001) than in controls. beta tended to be higher in HCM at rest (9.4 (4.6) vs 7.7 (4.2) ml/min) and during hyperaemia (25.8 (6.4) vs 23.1 (6.2) ml/min) than in controls. Septal endo-to-epi MBF decreased during hyperaemia (0.86 (0.15) to 0.64 (0.18), p<0.01). rBV was inversely correlated with left ventricular (LV) mass index (p<0.05). Both hyperaemic and endo-to-epi MBF were inversely correlated with LV end-diastolic pressure, LV mass index, and LV outflow tract pressure gradient (all p<0.05). MCE-derived MBF correlated well with PET at rest (r = 0.84) and hyperaemia (r = 0.87) (all p<0.001).

conclusionsIn patients with HCM, LV end-diastolic pressure, LV outflow tract pressure gradient, and LV mass index are independent predictors of rBV and hyperaemic MBF.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCardiomyopathy, HypertrophicCoronary DiseaseCoronary VesselsEchocardiographyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMicrocirculationMiddle AgedPositron-Emission Tomography

Identifiers

PMID17488767
PMCPMC2000941
OpenAlexW2141563574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.