Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17488292›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of clinical practice2007

Opioid-induced bowel dysfunction: prevalence, pathophysiology and burden.

S J Panchal, P Müller-Schwefe, J I Wurzelmann

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of clinical practice, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 120 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02086123 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2012, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing the Use of Perioperative Epidural Analgesia to Conventional Intravenous Narcotics and NSAIDS for Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, IrvineRan2012 to 2015Enrolled87ConditionsPain, PostoperativeArmsEpidural Analgesia, Parenteral Analgesia (Intravenous)
NCT03176121 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

A Long Term, Open-Label, Multi-Center Study Evaluating Safety and Tolerability of Oxycodone in Patients With Moderate to Severe Cancer Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorTaiwan Mundipharma Pharmaceuticals Ltd.Ran2016 to 2018Enrolled73ConditionsCancer, PainArmsOxycodone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 324 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pharmacological treatment for antipsychotic-related constipation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. The influence of brain metastases on the central nervous system effects of methylnaltrexone: a post hoc analysis of 3 randomized, double-blind studies.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Long-term safety and efficacy of oxycodone/naloxone prolonged-release tablets in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic cancer pain.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2015
    Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. De-prescribing opioids among Medicaid patients with long-term opioid use.Journal of substance use and addiction treatment · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S J PanchalNational Institute of Pain and Coalition for Pain Education Foundation, Tampa, FL 33558, USA. sunilpanchal2000@yahoo.com
P Müller-Schwefe
J I Wurzelmann
Research Triangle Park Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a result of the undesired action of opioids on the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, patients receiving opioid medication for chronic pain often experience opioid-induced bowel dysfunction (OBD), the most common and debilitating symptom of which is constipation. Based on clinical experience and a comprehensive MEDLINE literature review, this paper provides the primary care physician with an overview of the prevalence, pathophysiology and burden of OBD. Patients with OBD suffer from a wide range of symptoms including constipation, decreased gastric emptying, abdominal cramping, spasm, bloating, delayed GI transit and the formation of hard dry stools. OBD can have a serious negative impact on quality of life (QoL) and the daily activities that patients feel able to perform. To relieve constipation associated with OBD, patients often use laxatives chronically (associated with risks) or alter/abandon their opioid medication, potentially sacrificing analgesia. Physicians should have greater appreciation of the prevalence, symptoms and burden of OBD. In light of the serious negative impact OBD can have on QoL, physicians should encourage dialogue with patients to facilitate optimal symptomatic management of the condition. There is a pressing need for new therapies that act upon the underlying mechanisms of OBD.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeActivities of Daily LivingAnalgesics, OpioidCatharticsChronic DiseaseColicConstipationGastric EmptyingGastrointestinal TransitHumansPainSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAnalgesics, OpioidCathartics

Identifiers

PMID17488292
PMCPMC1974804
OpenAlexW1493383013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.