Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17485971›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2007

Amlodipine and valsartan combined and as monotherapy in stage 2, elderly, and black hypertensive patients: subgroup analyses of 2 randomized, placebo-controlled studies.

Timothy R Smith, Thomas Philipp, Bernard Vaisse, George L Bakris, Margaret Wernsing, Joseph Yen, Robert Glazer

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effect of Amlodipine/Valsartan Versus Nebivolol/Valsartan Fixed Dose Combinations on Peripheral and Central Blood Pressure.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2018
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Observational
  17. A review of the efficacy and tolerability of combination amlodipine/valsartan in non-white patients with hypertension.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2013
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Timothy R SmithMercy Health Research, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63141, USA. tsmith@stlo.mercy.net
Thomas Philipp
Bernard Vaisse
George L Bakris
Margaret Wernsing
Joseph Yen
Robert Glazer
Mercy Health · USAssistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille · FREssen University Hospital · DEUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with difficult to control hypertension typically require 2 or more agents to achieve goal blood pressure (BP) levels. Fixed-dose combination therapies with lower doses generally are well tolerated and more effective than higher-dose monotherapy. The authors performed prespecified and post hoc subgroup analyses of 2 double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials that assessed the efficacy and safety of amlodipine and valsartan, alone and in combination, in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Patients were randomized to amlodipine (study 1: 2.5 or 5 mg/d; study 2: 10 mg/d), valsartan (study 1: 40, 80, 160, or 320 mg/d; study 2: 160 or 320 mg/d), combination therapy across the same dose ranges, or placebo. Analyses were performed on changes from baseline in mean sitting systolic and diastolic BP and the occurrence of adverse events in specific subgroups of patients (ie, those with stage 2 hypertension [post hoc], the elderly [65 years or older], and blacks [both prespecified]). Amlodipine + valsartan combination therapy was associated with greater BP-lowering effects in the subgroups compared with each respective monotherapy and placebo. These findings were consistent with the primary efficacy analysis results from the overall study populations. Combination regimens were generally well tolerated by all patient subgroups.

Indexed as

Black PeopleAgedAge FactorsAmlodipineAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedResearch DesignSeverity of Illness IndexAmlodipineAntihypertensive AgentsTetrazolesValineValsartan

Identifiers

PMID17485971
PMCPMC8109965
OpenAlexW2044170646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.