ArticleThe Histochemical journal1991
A quantitative cytochemical investigation of osteoclasts and multinucleate giant cells.
Article in The Histochemical journal, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Utility of human placental alkaline phosphatase as a genetic marker for cell tracking in bone and cartilage.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2007Article
- Evidence that failure of osteoid bone matrix resorption is caused by perturbation of osteoclast polarization.The Histochemical journal · 1998Article
- Recording of mitochondrial transmembrane potential and volume in cultured rat osteoclasts by confocal laser scanning microscopy.The Histochemical journal · 1997Article
- NADPH-oxidase expression and in situ production of superoxide by osteoclasts actively resorbing bone.The Journal of cell biology · 1994Article
- Carbonic anhydrase II gene transcript in cultured osteoclasts from neonatal rats: effect of calcitonin.Cell and tissue research · 1994Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitative cytochemical, immunocytochemical, autoradiographic and electron cytochemical investigations have been used to compare osteoclasts with multinucleate giant cells that had been freshly obtained from the same animal. The levels of beta-acid galactosidase activity, the DNA in individual nuclei and the cellular protein content were similar in both cell types. However, osteoclasts generally possessed greater acid phosphatase and NADH dehydrogenase activity but lower levels of fluoride-inhibited non-specific esterase activity than multinucleate giant cells. The acid phosphatase activity in multinucleate giant cells was completely inhibited by 100 mM tartrate, but in osteoclasts only a 20% reduction in activity was observed. Formation of multinucleate giant cells in a "bone microenvironment" (thin bone slices) did not increase their content of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase activity. Moreover, in osteoclasts, endogenous peroxidase activity was undetectable but present in several granules within the cytoplasm of multinucleate giant cells. Osteoclasts and multinucleate giant cells displayed a similar microtubules distribution, but calcitonin, which induced rearrangement of microtubules and cellular contraction in osteoclasts, had no effect on multinucleate giant cells. Thus, these investigations reveal both similarities and differences between these two syncytia and support the hypothesis that osteoclasts and multinucleate giant cells are related. Possibly osteoclasts arise from monocyte progenitors before commitment to a macrophage lineage has occurred.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.