Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17485507›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2008

Use of population pharmacokinetic modeling and Monte Carlo simulation to describe the pharmacodynamic profile of cefditoren in plasma and epithelial lining fluid.

Thomas P Lodise, Martina Kinzig-Schippers, George L Drusano, Ulrich Loos, Friedrich Vogel, Jürgen Bulitta, Markus Hinder, Fritz Sörgel

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparison of oral third- versus first-/ second-generation cephalosporins for acute uncomplicated cystitis: a nationwide retrospective cohort study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Role of cefditoren in the treatment of community skin and soft tissue infections: revisiting the evidence].Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Generating Robust and Informative NonclinicalAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2019
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Update on the clinical utility and optimal use of cefditoren.International journal of general medicine · 2012
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas P LodiseInstitute for Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Research, Nürnberg-Heroldsberg, Germany.
Martina Kinzig-Schippers
George L Drusano
Ulrich Loos
Friedrich Vogel
Jürgen Bulitta
Markus Hinder
Fritz Sörgel
Institute for Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Research · DEAlbany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences · USAlbany Research Institute · USGrünenthal Group (Germany) · DEKnappschaftskrankenhaus Recklinghausen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cefditoren is a broad-spectrum, oral cephalosporin that is highly active against clinically relevant respiratory tract pathogens, including multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. This study described its pharmacodynamic profile in plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF). Plasma and ELF pharmacokinetic data were obtained from 24 patients under fasting conditions. Cefditoren and urea concentrations were determined in plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Concentration-time profiles in plasma and ELF were modeled using a model with three disposition compartments and first-order absorption, elimination, and transfer. Pharmacokinetic parameters were identified in a population pharmacokinetic analysis (big nonparametric adaptive grid with adaptive gamma). Monte Carlo simulation (9,999 subjects) was performed with the ADAPT II program to estimate the probability of target attainment at which the free-cefditoren plasma concentrations (88%) protein binding and total ELF concentrations exceeded the MIC for 33% of the dosing interval for 400 mg cefditoren given orally every 12 h. After the Bayesian step, the overall fits of the model to the data were good, and plots of predicted versus observed concentrations for plasma and ELF showed slopes and intercepts very close to the ideal values of 1.0 and 0.0, respectively. In the plasma probability of target attainment analysis, the probability of achieving a time for which free, or unbound, plasma concentration exceeds the MIC of the organism for 33% of the dosing interval was <80% for a MIC of >0.06 mg/liter. Similar to plasma, the probability of achieving a time above the MIC of 33% was <80% for MIC of >0.06 mg/liter in ELF. Cefditoren was found to have a low probability of achieving a bacteriostatic effect against MICs of >0.06 mg/liter, which includes most S. pneumoniae isolates with intermediate susceptibility to penicillin, when given in the fasting state in both plasma and ELF.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCephalosporinsModels, BiologicalMonte Carlo MethodAdultAgedBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidFemaleHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedUreaAnti-Bacterial AgentscefditorenCephalosporinsUrea

Identifiers

PMID17485507
PMCPMC2415801
OpenAlexW2117228960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.